3 December 2002Going for twentyWhen this site was launched in 1996, one of its pages was devoted to whining about my incredibly bad luck at picking Playboy's Playmate of the Year; up to that point, I had been completely wrong for thirteen years straight. Now it's nineteen years straight, and I have no reason to think I'll do any better this time around, but inasmuch as the January 2003 issue is out with the annual Playmate Review, it's time to make a fool of myself once more mainly because this page draws about five percent of the site's traffic, mostly from people looking for pictures pirated from Playboy (which I don't have), and I hate getting "Why haven't you updated?" letters. 0 for 19? You are quite the statistical oddity. Posted by: Ravnwood at 9:19 PM on 3 December 2002Yeah, you'd think I'd get one right once in a while. One of these days I'm going to sit down with boxes of back issues and see if I might have done better simply by selecting the blonde with the largest bust each year. (Actually, now that I think about it, the Anna Nicole factor - but never mind, I suddenly don't want to think about it.) Posted by: CGHill at 9:28 PM on 3 December 2002 |