12 January 2003Wed-letter daysThere exists as a legal construct in some parts of the country something called "covenant marriage", designed by churchly types to be harder to get out of than the standard variety. (In Oklahoma, this is not a particularly difficult task, as the laws here are flexible, even bendy; I have yet to see anyone claiming, say, "watching too damn much football" as grounds for divorce, but it seems to fall within the guidelines.) Yesterday a clergyman, having read the piece I wrote on it or maybe not having read it, given its slightly-jaundiced tone wrote me and thanked me for this bit of outreach, and suggested a link back to his own ministry, for the greater glory of the Lord and all that. There are times when someone else's earnestness outweighs my snarkiness, and this was one of them, so I duly tacked on a new paragraph. Besides, given my tendency to look for connections where none likely exist, this weekend marks the 25th anniversary of the one time I took this particular step, a step for which I was poorly prepared and which led to some serious backpedaling not too many years later, and while I'm not arguing that what goes around comes around, certainly what goes around leaves little reminders of where it's been. OK, like almost every state, is a "no-fault" divorce state. This means that I can be a serial cheater and it will not make any difference when it comes down to who gets what when the marriage ends. Custody is another matter, but unless someone is beating/molesting the kids, the default custody order is a joint one. So, watching too much football would fall under the legal defintion of irreconciable differences. Posted by: Chris at 11:52 AM on 13 January 2003Yeah, I know. I went through that particular mill in 1987, though being a couch potato was not an issue at the time. Posted by: CGHill at 1:21 PM on 13 January 2003 |