The Finch Formerly Known As Gold

6 April 2003

Meanwhile, back at the left

I was relatively restrained, say the commenters, on that Margaret Atwood piece, and well, to me it seemed the appropriate timbre for a response: when you're scolded by a maiden-aunt figure, it's not particularly useful to lash out with intemperance.

On the other hand — though the same wing — some people are just asking for it. In this spirit, I give you Alan Bisbort of the Hartford Advocate, who offers the following under the implausible title I Miss America:

Next to the high crimes and low misdemeanors perpetrated by this Bush administration, Nixon's sins seem, well, if not quaint, then understandable within the context of the times. Even though he will forever bear the blame for the expansion of the Vietnam War with his bombings of Cambodia and Laos — and the terrible "blowback" they bred — it should be noted that Nixon inherited that war from two Democratic predecessors, that the largest troop escalations were done on Lyndon Johnson's watch.

Ironically, beyond these much more serious sins, the crimes that led to Nixon's impeachment hearings and resignation in August 1974 seem so, well, tame: he bugged the campaign headquarters of a Democratic opponent (George McGovern) whom all polls indicated he'd beat in a landslide in Nov. 1972 (he did). And, then, when the press discovered that this break-in led back to the White House, he covered it up. That's it. Sounds like standard, and unchallenged, presidential protocol these days.

Indeed, the crimes of George W. Bush ON A DAILY BASIS surpass the collective crimes of Richard Nixon's entire presidential career.

Say what? "On a daily basis"? I'll grant you that Watergate was every bit the "third-rate burglary" it was reputed to be, but the subsequent stonewalling came perilously close to being an impeachable offense, back when that term actually meant something. (The Clinton proceedings, I think, lowered the bar for impeachment to approximately the same degree that Clinton lowered his shorts.) Is there a Bush "enemies list"? The guest list on The O'Reilly Factor doesn't count. Has Bush moved to sack persons who might present a legal threat, as did Nixon with erstwhile Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox and assistant AG William Ruckelshaus? Is there anything on Dubya's CV that looks even remotely like this?

Oh, wait, you're not through. Okay:

So, why aren't people more outraged by the current White House's abuse of power, unprecedented in American history?

What could be more criminal than to start a war by invading another country that poses no immediate threat? What could be more criminal than starting this war by using fictitious documents, photographs and threats of retaliation against countries, and longtime allies, that will not go along with this charade? What could be more criminal than to perpetrate, and escalate, this terrible bloodshed even as we speak? What could be more telling about this Little Caesar in the White House that, even as he needlessly puts our brave, dutiful soldiers in harm's way, he is cutting the benefits to veterans of previous wars? What could be more criminal than to loot the U.S. Treasury to conduct a blood-for-oil feud, then pass the cost on to generations unborn?

Let me guess: You're upset because we didn't send the Marines to Riyadh on the 12th of September. Oh, you're not? Wasn't that enough of an immediate threat? Or is it going to take mining the runway at Bradley International to get your attention? It obviously can't be some sudden concern for Iraqi civilians, since Saddam routinely whacked more of them on a, um, "daily basis" than we've managed in half a month so far. You want criminals, Al, you're looking at the wrong end of the pipeline.

And if you're this upset about some imagined "blood-for-oil" feud — and by the way, in the unlikely event that anyone is engineering a trade, I take type A, RH-factor positive, and Castrol 10W-30 — the very least you can do is refuse to participate. Separate yourself from all things oil-based. Sell your car. Rip out that heating system that burns up so many gallons of the wicked stuff every winter. It's the perfect day to do it, what with spring on the way, and — what's that? Ten inches of snow due today? Well, damn. But we can't let mere weather interfere with Doing the Right Thing, can we? Put on your mittens and tear out that furnace.

I miss the America that stood up to Richard Nixon. Even Dick Nixon looks good to me now.

I'm a registered Democrat, and the fact that Nixon was President when I turned eighteen is a major reason why, but I'll tell you what, Al: when Connecticut secedes from the Union, I'll send you a couple of bucks to help finance a Nixon memorial in downtown Waterbury. Until then, if you're going to keep recycling this "Bush is Evil" tripe, you'd be better off keeping your trap shut — or letting it freeze shut.

Posted at 3:13 PM to Wastes of Oxygen


TrackBack: 12:42 AM, 7 April 2003
» Who Knew? from Oscar Jr. Was Here
It should surprise no one that CGHill FisksŪ like a true gentleman (Grade Level 9.7): Let me guess: You're upset because we didn't send the Marines to Riyadh on the 12th of September. Oh, you're not? Wasn't that enough of......[read more]

I often read your blog.....entertaining and intelligently written, but sometimes way off the mark in an international sense.
I quote you.....
"Let me guess: You're upset because we didn't send the Marines to Riyadh on the 12th of September. Oh, you're not? Wasn't that enough of an immediate threat? Or is it going to take mining the runway at Bradley International to get your attention? It obviously can't be some sudden concern for Iraqi civilians, since Saddam routinely whacked more of them on a, um, "daily basis" than we've managed in half a month so far. You want criminals, Al, you're looking at the wrong end of the pipeline."

I am very fortunate that one of my hobbies is Satellite TV...not the Sky type, but a Digital Receiver with a motorised dish.

This is capable of receiving broadcasts from most countries around the globe, including the Middle East. Some of these Arabic TV transmissions have an English language sound track.

Thats the " techie " bit out of the way...the cold stark reality is I can view Al Jazeera, a world Arabic station, in English language.

Earlier today I witnessed a very sickening sight, Iraqi Women and Children being kicked and punched by Amercan Soldiers, obviously I considered the factual content, however, the soldiers were obviously American, and the children were clearly children, the women were dressed in their usual clothing, however, this was being ripped away by the soldiers.

Is this how the Americans are hoping to win the trust of ordinary Iraqi people ? I was truly sickened by this event, for sure, you will not see it on the biased BBC / Sky/ITV Propoganda channels.......

We only see what THEY want us to......do not give up on Truth for the sake of patriotism.

Posted by: jIm at 4:59 AM on 7 April 2003

It wouldn't surprise me if I were off base; as I recall, during Vietnam I had difficulty picking up Radio Ho Chi Minh on the ol' Grundig shortwave.

Posted by: CGHill at 6:53 AM on 7 April 2003

Al Jazeera - there's an objective news outlet for you. Let's see, women have blown themselves up as suicide killers at military checkpoints and Iraqi schools have been teaching kids about suicide bombs. So not all that appear to be civilians are. Anyway, jIm should lay off the satellite tv and get a life.

Posted by: Martin at 8:32 AM on 7 April 2003

Oh yeah, if you see it on Al Jazeera it must be true, just like if you see it on CNN/BBC/Fox/NBC etc. it must be fake. Those poor, honest, objective, Arabs can always be trusted to be honest and objective. [/sarcasm]

Posted by: Lynn S at 10:50 AM on 8 April 2003

That last paragraph didn't come out quite like I intended. Oh well...you get the idea.

Posted by: Lynn S at 10:52 AM on 8 April 2003

Found u today, Dust. U r hilarious!!!! Love it! Keep up the gud wk!

Posted by: dian smith at 4:41 PM on 8 April 2003