The Finch Formerly Known As Gold

7 December 2003

Sole sustenance

Mark Pierce takes a dim view of cosmetic surgery for the feet:

I know I'm only a guy and therefore could not possibly understand such things. But does anyone else think that cutting into the foot for cosmetic reasons is just not the brightest thing in the world? Again, maybe it's just me... and admittedly beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but the foot is not exactly the sexiest part of the body anyway. Is it?

Cosmetic surgery in general is perhaps not the brightest thing in the world, though I'd be the last person in the world to tell the Sixpacks (Joe and Susan, not necessarily including their 2.3 kids) that they shouldn't go spending their money (their insurance likely won't cover it) on trying to look better: if it buys you some peace of mind or an occasional wolf whistle, it may be worth the risk that comes with any medical procedure more complicated than popping a couple of Advil.

Still, the foot is a fiendishly-complicated arrangement of hard-to-fix parts, and there's a lot to be said for "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." And is it sexy? Certainly it can be. (Bless you, Jimmy and Manolo and Michelle.)

Posted at 6:26 PM to Almost Yogurt


Sure, people can do whatever they want with their feet. But ugh, I reminds me of the ancient "art" of foot-binding.

Posted by: sya at 7:27 AM on 8 December 2003

I thought of that, and decided not to mention it, since the very thought of it creeps me out.

Posted by: CGHill at 7:55 AM on 8 December 2003

I'm a big fan of scar revision in really obvious places, but FEET? hmm

hln

Posted by: hln at 8:32 PM on 8 December 2003