"I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less."
1 January 2004My name is Charles H., and I blogI figure, any quiz that can draw both Venomous Kate and James Joyner demands my attention. The average score at the moment I took this test was 42.9 out of 100; I scored, um, 64, which means:
51 through 80 percent: You are a dedicated weblogger. You post frequently because you enjoy weblogging a lot, yet you still manage to have a social life. You're the best kind of weblogger. Way to go!
Uh, what is this "social life" of which they speak? TrackBack: 2:52 PM, 2 January 2004 » Another Goofy Quiz from Horologium (The title will undoubtedly get me MORE hits from whoever keeps googling "goofy quiz" and hitting my site). Are You a Blogaholic? I scored a 60, which puts me in the "dedicated weblogger" category. I scored well above the average......[read more] TrackBack: 9:51 PM, 2 January 2004 » Even sweet addictions allow no breaks! from Classical Values This is a bad time for blogging, because in the past few days I have not had any time at all to think, much less write. "All partied out," is as fair a description as I can allow under the......[read more] TrackBack: 10:39 PM, 4 January 2004 » I am bloggier, BLOGGIER than Thou! from Thief's Den Horologium found this wonderful blogging quiz -- Are You A Blogoholic? He scored a 64. His friend CG Hill scored a 48. I scored a 68. You are a dedicated weblogger. You post frequently because you enjoy weblogging a lot, yet you still manage to have a ......[read more] 76. Hey, at least it's not as high as my cholesterol. Posted by: David at 2:42 AM on 2 January 200468. Posted by: Lynn S at 3:07 PM on 2 January 2004Gee, I only scored 36, said if I posted more often it would help. Oh well, I like being casual. Posted by: anstranger at 6:41 PM on 2 January 200440. Which was not what I expected. Posted by: sya at 9:48 AM on 3 January 200448. Which was what I expected. Quizzes like this are a cinch to manipulate. I would have gone high side of 50 if I'd answered the last question honestly... Posted by: Alan Sullivan at 9:55 AM on 4 January 2004 |