The Finch Formerly Known As Gold

13 February 2004

Purely scriptural

What would a Constitutional amendment defining marriage strictly according to Old Testament principles look like?

I suppose that depends on which principles you choose to read.

(Muchas gracias: JP LeCompte.)

Posted at 6:27 PM to Immaterial Witness

TrackBack: 11:27 PM, 13 February 2004
» Constructionists? from Blog o'RAM
With arguments being made for and against the philosophy that Supreme Court Justices (state or federal) should interpret a Constitution based on its original intent combined with the spectacle of the Massachusetts Assembly and the U.S. Congress struggl......[read more]

For a second there, I thought they were being serious.
Actually, to tell you the truth, I'm still not really sure.

Posted by: TobaccoTom at 7:31 PM on 13 February 2004

Actually, I think they might have been, but they lapsed into the vernacular towards the end in an effort to soften the blow.

Or not. It's not like I've never been wrong before.

Posted by: CGHill at 7:40 PM on 13 February 2004

I still don't know if they were serious or not, but it sure is scary. sometimes you just got wonder about some groups.

Posted by: anstranger at 11:23 AM on 14 February 2004

Works for me. Especially that concubine thing. Woo-hoo!

Posted by: Midwestern Suburban Dad at 2:24 PM on 14 February 2004