22 February 2004
And the task falls to Dawn Eden, who was assigned duty on a two-page color section devoted to The Passion of the Christ that appeared in this morning's New York Post. (The paper's Web site, as of a couple minutes ago, contained only the intro.) Part of that duty was to determine how closely director Mel Gibson had hewn to the text of the Gospels.
Her conclusion: It's a mixed bag.
While The Passion may indeed be an inspired film, no one seeing this film should think they're getting the pure gospel truth. It's colored throughout with imagery which, while it may be in keeping with Roman Catholic tradition, is nonetheless distinctly extrabiblical.
This might explain John Paul II's reported enthusiasm for the film, anyway.
Still, whatever Gibson's vision, give him credit for sticking to it, and for going outside The Industry to sell it. Had this been the usual Hollywood biopic, we'd probably be yawning at the prospect of Ashton Kutcher in Dude, Where's My Cross?Posted at 9:58 AM to Immaterial Witness
TrackBack: 12:04 PM, 23 February 2004
» Passionate Movegoing from Dan and Angi Have Something to Say
Some more God squad for those of you who like it so much. ;-) I generally like to sit on the sidelines of the culture war and throw spitballs at both sides. (How's THAT for a mixed metaphor?!) Much to......[read more]