5 November 2005Lacking in essential BobnessJust to make one thing crystal clear: "Bob" in this Jacqueline Passey post is not me. Really. It isn't. (Nor did commenter David Alexander grow up to be me, either, in case that's occurred to you.) Posted at 4:00 PM to Table for OneWhich one essential is lacking, then: the fantasizing part or idecision part? And unless you assume we're too lazy to follow "about Chaz" link, why do you think would we take self-admitted "evil statist" barely post-virgin in 18-to 24 age group David Alexander to be you? I can tell you this, though: ethereal fairies will turn into vengeful witches every time when subjected to conflicted expectations long enough. I'm not saying fairies do not exist, it's that their beauty appears on a different plane, more reality-rooted. But you should know that, in your "after 48" wisdom, shouldn't you? The getting of wisdom has proven to be a slower process than I might have hoped. And I'm not quite sure whether I'm indecisive or not. Posted by: CGHill at 7:34 PM on 5 November 2005Men who believe women are ethereal fairies are bound to be disappointed. Posted by: Rachel at 5:25 PM on 7 November 2005True enough; I've always figured that the Next Level in any relationship comes when the participants are no longer desperate to conceal perfectly ordinary bodily functions. (Although being boastful about them, I suspect, is a negative indicator.) A definite negative. Posted by: Rachel at 2:49 PM on 8 November 2005 |