5 December 2005Some of us can readOf the 69 American cities with populations of 250,000 or more, Oklahoma City is, says this survey, the 38th most literate. (Seattle is at the top; Stockton, California, the bottom.) Components of this scale:
A fairly middling showing, except for the Net-usage level, a new consideration for this year's survey, and given some of what's on the Net, I'd wonder if that criterion should be given so much weight. Incidentally, we pulled 49th last year in Libraries, which indicates either some substantial gains or a major tweak in the methodology. Tulsa, which made Top 15 in both Educational Level and Libraries, scored 24th overall, tied with Tampa; their worst showing, which will surprise no one who has read this, is in Newspaper Circulation 48th, tied with Wichita. Compared with last year, Oklahoma City is up one notch, despite the poor Net showing, and Tulsa is down three. Posted at 7:01 AM to SoonerlandI'm not surprised at Atlanta's showing. When I was living in the intown Virginia Highlands neighborhood, I had three excellent used bookstores and a public library within a three block distance of my apartment. Posted by: Tam at 9:42 AM on 5 December 2005Stockton's poor showing is in no way surprising -- 25 years ago it was a sleepy little market town. Little culture, arts, anything outside of University of the Pacific. Most middle-class and above Stocktonians looked to San Francisco for all things cultural, and read the Sacramento Bee for news. Posted by: liz ditz at 11:47 AM on 5 December 2005Heh. Tulsa's "news"paper circulation should count against them. Posted by: Dan at 3:51 PM on 5 December 2005 |