<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Operating at a loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026/comment-page-1#comment-27872</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10026#comment-27872</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me that that&#039;s perhaps the footwear equivalent of the mullet haircut, of which it was famously said, &quot;Business in the front, party in the back.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that that&#8217;s perhaps the footwear equivalent of the mullet haircut, of which it was famously said, &#8220;Business in the front, party in the back.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026/comment-page-1#comment-27868</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10026#comment-27868</guid>
		<description>Perfect, if probably itchy, for the current weather/climate. Does eliminate the presumed intended sexiness of the shoe, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect, if probably itchy, for the current weather/climate. Does eliminate the presumed intended sexiness of the shoe, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan of Argghh!</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026/comment-page-1#comment-27862</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan of Argghh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10026#comment-27862</guid>
		<description>Oh the shoe is really desirable. Yummy, in fact.

That is most definitely a sock however. Look at how thickly it&#039;s knit.

Someone should be dragged off and shot, as Acidman was wont to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the shoe is really desirable. Yummy, in fact.</p>
<p>That is most definitely a sock however. Look at how thickly it&#8217;s knit.</p>
<p>Someone should be dragged off and shot, as Acidman was wont to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Salmon</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026/comment-page-1#comment-27850</link>
		<dc:creator>John Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10026#comment-27850</guid>
		<description>That combo looks tackorama. And I guess I don&#039;t get the idea of a high-heeled sandal. I&#039;ll have to check with one of my sisters, who works in the fashion world, but I bet she&#039;d agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That combo looks tackorama. And I guess I don&#8217;t get the idea of a high-heeled sandal. I&#8217;ll have to check with one of my sisters, who works in the fashion world, but I bet she&#8217;d agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10026/comment-page-1#comment-27849</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10026#comment-27849</guid>
		<description>Now I&#039;m half tempted to go into my flickr stream, grab the photo of the heaviest crunchiest socks that I&#039;ve knit that I have on there, and caption it:

&quot;I R SRS SOX. I DEMAND SRS SHOE.&quot;

But yeah. I guess they&#039;re trying to call up the spirit of the 80s with the stilettos and socks, but really, I think that&#039;s too many of Madonna&#039;s re-inventions in the past to be able to be resuscitated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m half tempted to go into my flickr stream, grab the photo of the heaviest crunchiest socks that I&#8217;ve knit that I have on there, and caption it:</p>
<p>&#8220;I R SRS SOX. I DEMAND SRS SHOE.&#8221;</p>
<p>But yeah. I guess they&#8217;re trying to call up the spirit of the 80s with the stilettos and socks, but really, I think that&#8217;s too many of Madonna&#8217;s re-inventions in the past to be able to be resuscitated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

