<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whatever happened to style?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheney W. Halliburton</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-28017</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheney W. Halliburton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-28017</guid>
		<description>The latter kind are in charge these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latter kind are in charge these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-28011</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-28011</guid>
		<description>There are, I suspect, two types of people: those who want fun, and those who don&#039;t want anyone to have fun.

Other divisions are possible, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are, I suspect, two types of people: those who want fun, and those who don&#8217;t want anyone to have fun.</p>
<p>Other divisions are possible, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheney W. Halliburton</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-28010</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheney W. Halliburton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-28010</guid>
		<description>Fun? People want fun in 2010?

How quaint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun? People want fun in 2010?</p>
<p>How quaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-27996</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-27996</guid>
		<description>Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-27976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-27976</guid>
		<description>We need more tiger in our tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need more tiger in our tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-27972</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-27972</guid>
		<description>Assuming a &#039;68 Fury, which I think was the last year they stuck Roman numerals on them, 39-cent gas, adjusted for inflation, would be $2.38.

Which is still better than what I&#039;m paying for premium down at the &lt;em&gt;[fill in name of convenience store].&lt;/em&gt;

I find it somewhat amusing that the sweet spot for the V6 these days is 3.7 liters, or just about the same displacement as Chrysler&#039;s legendary slant six.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming a &#8217;68 Fury, which I think was the last year they stuck Roman numerals on them, 39-cent gas, adjusted for inflation, would be $2.38.</p>
<p>Which is still better than what I&#8217;m paying for premium down at the <em>[fill in name of convenience store].</em></p>
<p>I find it somewhat amusing that the sweet spot for the V6 these days is 3.7 liters, or just about the same displacement as Chrysler&#8217;s legendary slant six.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Dennison</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/10073/comment-page-1#comment-27970</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Dennison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=10073#comment-27970</guid>
		<description>(Long, nostalgic sigh.)   I miss my 383 4-barrel Fury III convertible and my Triumph GT-6+ -- they were fun!!!!  Or do I really miss being 20-something and crazy and 39 cents a gallon for high test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Long, nostalgic sigh.)   I miss my 383 4-barrel Fury III convertible and my Triumph GT-6+ &#8212; they were fun!!!!  Or do I really miss being 20-something and crazy and 39 cents a gallon for high test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

