You can’t spell “cup” without “c u”

First, a restatement of principles, previously codified as Lileks’ Law of Lingerie:

Let us be frank about the purpose of lingerie… It is not normal clothing. It exists for one purpose: to be, eventually, visible for a very short time. If it is visible for a very long time — and I am trying to be delicate about this — then it is not doing its job.

Fluorescent bra by Deborah MarquitThat said, it must be taken into account that some people do not necessarily endorse this particular worldview. For them, there is this lace underwire bra that comes in five fluorescent colors, which presumably will be worn under something relatively flimsy to a place where the lighting can make it visible for longer than a very short time.

This is, I hasten to add, not something I’ve encountered in real life myself. However, the Shoe Girl, a fashion designer herself, spotted this particular look on an A-list singer/fashionista and was sufficiently smitten by the concept to email the celeb in question and ask “Where did you get these?” Celeb responds, Shoe Girl puts up a blog post, I stare in disbelief for a couple of seconds, and then I put up a blog post. It’s amazing how efficiently this particular process works, even if occasionally it challenges my most cherished values.





4 comments

  1. paulsmos »

    12 April 2010 · 6:17 pm

    Yeah, Baby…shuck that laundry!!

  2. Amy Acker presents “The Federal Reserve: Engine of Corruption” »

    18 April 2010 · 3:30 pm

    […] Lileks’ Law of Lingerie   Jacqueline Kennedy   BARBARA ANN LAWFORD […]

  3. Rule 5 Sunday : The Other McCain »

    18 April 2010 · 4:12 pm

    […] their husbands.Sports maven Fishersville Mike had Amy Mickelson, after her husband won the Masters.Dustbury catches us up on Lileks’ Law of Lingerie. Obey the law, people. He also celebrates Emma […]

  4. TheShoeGirl »

    6 August 2010 · 4:50 pm

    Check out my latest post! I finally found one :)
    xox

RSS feed for comments on this post