Without benefit of visuals

As most of you have noticed by now, I have long been mystified by the appeal of fishnets, and by “long” I mean for at least seven years, even at those moments when I’m inclined to celebrate their presence.

Sienna Miller, in this clip, explains the process to Steve Buscemi:

Well, okay, if you say so. I’d like to think there’s a bit less BDSM to it, but what do I know?

(Via Ferdinand Bardamu.)





5 comments

  1. Tatyana »

    7 January 2011 · 2:07 pm

    it was sad to see a comment signed *triticale* @your link to 7yrs ago.

    on subj of your condition: do you feel the same indifference to lace bras?

  2. CGHill »

    7 January 2011 · 2:19 pm

    I miss the guy too.

    Lace disturbs me not at all: the garments might seem overly clinical otherwise.

  3. Tatyana »

    7 January 2011 · 4:27 pm

    so try applying the same rationale to fishnet: it’s elementary lace, aimed at bringing some joy to otherwise clinical garment

  4. CGHill »

    7 January 2011 · 5:48 pm

    Then again, there are two separate manifestations of hosiery: blatantly obvious, in which case the additional pattern is superfluous, or trying to be inconspicuous, in which case the additional pattern is counterproductive — you might as well stick a hat on the Invisible Woman.

  5. For C.G.H. among us « Скрипучая беседка »

    27 January 2011 · 9:19 pm

    […] what do you say, Chaz – you still don’t get the […]

RSS feed for comments on this post