<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just back away slowly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:07:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193/comment-page-1#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>CT: are those iPod earbuds permanently attached to your head? If you see someone you want to talk to, the normal thing to do is to: 1) make eye contact and a physical gesture, like a wave, to get the person&#039;s attention, and 2) &lt;i&gt;remove the earbuds so you can talk to each other&lt;/i&gt;.

Of course, if the person is a stranger you&#039;ve become &quot;interested&quot; in, the possiblity always exists that she/he is not similarly interested in you. The way to find out is to try the eye-contact thing. If she/he frowns or looks startled and then looks away, you know not to bother de-iPodding yourself.

Sheesh. I&#039;m one of the most misanthropic people I know, and even I can figure this out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CT: are those iPod earbuds permanently attached to your head? If you see someone you want to talk to, the normal thing to do is to: 1) make eye contact and a physical gesture, like a wave, to get the person&#8217;s attention, and 2) <i>remove the earbuds so you can talk to each other</i>.</p>
<p>Of course, if the person is a stranger you&#8217;ve become &#8220;interested&#8221; in, the possiblity always exists that she/he is not similarly interested in you. The way to find out is to try the eye-contact thing. If she/he frowns or looks startled and then looks away, you know not to bother de-iPodding yourself.</p>
<p>Sheesh. I&#8217;m one of the most misanthropic people I know, and even I can figure this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Snitch!</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193/comment-page-1#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Snitch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>...they have campfires on the subway platforms?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;they have campfires on the subway platforms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Snitch!</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193/comment-page-1#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Snitch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>Uh, what about all the people we &lt;b&gt;don&#039;t want interacting with us under any circumstances&lt;/b&gt; who, thank God, are safely ensconsed behind their iPods?

You missing all that warm &amp; fuzzy human contact, fella? Lemme show you around Jersey City.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, what about all the people we <b>don&#8217;t want interacting with us under any circumstances</b> who, thank God, are safely ensconsed behind their iPods?</p>
<p>You missing all that warm &#038; fuzzy human contact, fella? Lemme show you around Jersey City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193/comment-page-1#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>As a means of discouraging interaction on mass transit, I&#039;ve found that verbal self-interaction works, especially when punctuate by random non-rhythmic twitches.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a means of discouraging interaction on mass transit, I&#8217;ve found that verbal self-interaction works, especially when punctuate by random non-rhythmic twitches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193/comment-page-1#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/1193#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>I think blaming the audio cocooning comes from justifying missed opportunities. When I step on a subway train and end up face-to-face with someone I want to talk to but can&#039;t due to one/both of us being iPodded, the instant regret gets assigned to the device. Even though we&#039;d still keep our distance if unengaged.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think blaming the audio cocooning comes from justifying missed opportunities. When I step on a subway train and end up face-to-face with someone I want to talk to but can&#8217;t due to one/both of us being iPodded, the instant regret gets assigned to the device. Even though we&#8217;d still keep our distance if unengaged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
