As tiers go by

Mayor Mick and various local types make a lot of noise about this being a Big League City. I don’t have a problem with that, particularly, but I must point out that there are advantages to not being too big:

[L]iving in smaller cities doesn’t merely save money; it saves aggravation as well. For example, I don’t have to worry about Chicago turning into a prison camp to keep a few VIPs safe and happy during the upcoming NATO summit. Nor need I worry about my city hosting the Olympics, or a Democratic or Republican convention. I won’t be late to work because traffic stopped in all directions to spare the presidential limousine the indignity of waiting at a red light like some (pardon my French) ordinary American citizen. Eeew.

Yeah, yeah, we know: security. If you need security so damned badly, why aren’t you having these events in some remote location like Snake’s Navel, Nebraska, where there’s no place for your putative enemies to hide? (Answer: “Aristocrats are entitled to party in their own inimitable fashion. Now shut up.”)







2 comments

  1. Roxeanne de Luca »

    19 May 2012 · 7:11 pm

    You know another great place to host conventions and meetings and such? Crawford, Texas.

  2. CGHill »

    19 May 2012 · 8:34 pm

    That might work. It’s small enough (maybe 800 people in town, not counting the residents at GWB Central), and there are a few metropolitan amenities down the road in Waco. Then again, some people’s eyes bug out whenever Waco is mentioned.

    And hey, they can always invite Ted Nugent, who has a place in the same county.

RSS feed for comments on this post