We put the “suc” in “sucrose”

Sugar prices are “historically low” this year, and the USDA simply will not stand for that:

The federal government will intervene in the sugar market for the first time in more than a decade, spending up to $38 million in an effort to forestall a later bailout of sugar producers in Minnesota and elsewhere that could cost more than $300 million.

Minnesota is home to the nation’s largest beet sugar industry, which is protected by import tariffs and supported by loan guarantees.

This intervention smacks (but not Sugar Smacks) of Rube Goldberg:

The USDA market intervention involves buying sugar from domestic producers, then swapping it for import credits allotted to coastal U.S. sugar refineries under a “re-export” program. The coastal refineries get a credit for the imports, but must then export the finished product so as not to compete with domestic sugar suppliers.

This is consistent with other current government programs intended to save everyone’s job but yours.

(Via Amy Alkon.)


  1. McGehee »

    22 June 2013 · 8:31 am

    And to maintain as many organized and deep-pocketed constituencies for Leviathan as possible.

  2. Brett »

    22 June 2013 · 9:49 am

    Is good plan. I like it.
    –J. Stalin

  3. fillyjonk »

    22 June 2013 · 4:15 pm

    And I hear Homer Simpson saying, “First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women….”

    Also, I blame this whole power structure for why soda doesn’t taste as good as it did when I was a kid. (Back when they still put real sugar in it, instead of chemically-altered corn syrup….)

RSS feed for comments on this post