Suits her

Suzette finds a smidgen of redeeming social value in the inevitable Clinton presidency:

I can think of a blazing bright side right off: I am almost positive that we’ll never see her exposing her 70something bare legs.

The key word, though, is “almost”:

She is a Democrat after all and their prime directive does seem to be the degradation of standards wherever possible.

The YouTube channel known as ShePolitico has a couple of dozen videos (if “videos” describes a series of still photos with occasional zoom) of women in politics, concentrating on their legs (is anyone surprised at this?), and yes, they have a 90-second overview of the Hillarygams, though I must note that, atypically for ShePolitico, there are no drooling close-ups.


  1. Roger Green »

    26 April 2014 · 12:37 am

    As NOT inevitable as a Clinton Presidency is (less so than 2007), my irritation with certain members of the punditocracy has to do with her impending granny status.

  2. CGHill »

    26 April 2014 · 12:11 pm

    Indeed. What did Chelsea ever do to be the object of mockery?

  3. Roger Green »

    26 April 2014 · 12:18 pm

    Don’t know, but on SNL, back in the day, they made some snarky remark about her looks: “After comedian Mike Myers said ‘Chelsea Clinton—not a babe’ on a 1993 Saturday Night Live skit, Hillary Clinton scolded the show’s staff for ‘having nothing better to do than be mean and cruel to a young girl.'” As apology, they redubbed her “babe in waiting.”

  4. CGHill »

    26 April 2014 · 1:35 pm

    And I recall, vaguely, one instance where Rush Limbaugh unloaded on her, and was called out for it by most of the civilized world.

RSS feed for comments on this post