|
1 January 2004
Where it all begins
Folks from 'round here will tell you that it always rains on the State Fair, and that something unpleasant will happen on Opening Night. There's at least some truth to the former the State Fair is scheduled in early fall, one of the wetter periods of the year and maybe there's some to the latter as well, since Opening Night in Oklahoma City is 31 December, about the time Old Man Winter starts catching on to the fact that he's in charge again. The rain doesn't keep people away from the Fair, though, and the downtown party that is Opening Night goes on even when the temperature is in single digits and the wind is howling from Hudson Bay and there's more ice on the sidewalks than in the drinks. As a concept, Opening Night dates back to the Eighties, when the city and its culturemeisters observed that downtown tends to run down at sundown, and figured a New Year's Eve bash might draw some people out of the 'burbs for a change. Events were scheduled all over the place you buy a button, you get admission to almost all of them at no extra charge and eateries that normally closed when their business clientele went home stayed open late. Despite spectacularly crappy weather in the early years, Opening Night did well, and when the Bricktown entertainment district began taking shape, Opening Night did even better. Forty thousand folks turned up last night and bought their buttons (six bucks); many more just came to party along the canal or in the streets. Times Square it ain't, but then we don't have to wonder if there's a picture of Dick Clark moldering away in a closet somewhere either. Me? I came down with a bad case of the green-apple quick-step and retreated quickly. But thank you for asking. Permalink to this item ( posted at 10:25 AM to City Scene
)
Creatures of privilege
Down in the comments on this item, we seem to be getting into a dust-up over who is, and who isn't, "privileged, pampered and powerful," to borrow Bruce's phrase. (And it's a damned fine phrase at that; I may have to use it for something one of these days.) Taking these considerations in reverse order: I don't feel especially powerful, and the gastric ailment that hit me yesterday doesn't help matters. I can get things done, sometimes. Pampered? Maybe. As the saying goes, I can do without essentials, but I must have my luxuries. It must be noted, though, that both luxuries and essentials are acquired the old-fashioned way: I earned them. As to the question of privilege: fifteen years ago, I was broke and living out of a thirteen-year-old car. It took some resources some from friends and relatives, some from government to put me back on something resembling a firm footing. I feel very much privileged, in that assistance was offered, that I was able to take advantage of what was offered me, and that eventually, I was able to resume a relatively-normal existence. Some people, faced with the same situation, would not feel privileged; they would want to know what the hell happened to their entitlements. And some of those same people, I expect, would protest that these things were offered to me because I'm that very personification of evil, a white male. Given the fact that my mother was half Mexican and half Syrian, I'm not so white as I look, but that's not going to matter to these people: I am by definition one of the oppressors, and I get no credit for ethnicity because obviously at some point I sold out. There's only one possible response to that: "And I'm damn glad somebody was buying when I did." Indeed, it's a privilege. Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:40 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
Notes from a cold-hearted orb
Dear whoever (if anyone) is programming 96.9 "Bob" FM: If you're going to run a feature on Big Hits of 1972, the inclusion of the Moody Blues' "Nights in White Satin", a track which was recorded in 1967 and which you play entirely too often anyway, is prima facie evidence that you don't have a farging clue. Yes, I know: the single (Deram 85023; I have a copy) was a colossal flop on its initial release, and didn't become a Top Ten hit until, yes, 1972. But you didn't play the single; you played the entire 7:41 album track, from opening orchestral flourishes through "Breathe deep, the gathering gloom" all the way to the final gong, which you then segued into "Layla". Which, by the way, came out in 1971, though I'm willing to let that slide. (The '71 single release was cut to 2:43; the '72 reissue ran the full seven minutes and odd; nobody ever plays the short version.)
My name is Charles H., and I blog
I figure, any quiz that can draw both Venomous Kate and James Joyner demands my attention. The average score at the moment I took this test was 42.9 out of 100; I scored, um, 64, which means:
51 through 80 percent: You are a dedicated weblogger. You post frequently because you enjoy weblogging a lot, yet you still manage to have a social life. You're the best kind of weblogger. Way to go!
Uh, what is this "social life" of which they speak? Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:28 PM to Blogorrhea
)
2 January 2004
Hey, hey, ho, ho, these 15 have got to go
Should anyone be curious, these are the names I have picked for the Amish Tech Support Dead Pool for 2004:
Last year, I scored for exactly one pick: David Brinkley. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:25 AM to Blogorrhea
)
The best of all possible worlds
The wisdom of Jay Solo:
You should always fall in love mutually with your best friend. It's a Good Thing.
Few of us are so fortunate, but a Good Thing it most assuredly is. My congratulations to Jay and Deb. May they find every happiness along their way to eternity. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:21 AM to Table for One
)
Halfway measures
A question from Alan K. Henderson:
Can anyone tell me why Austin has a 38½ Street?
The short answer: well, it's between 38th and 39th. In Austin generally, the half-streets are used in preference to dubbing one of them "Place" or "Terrace", as is done up here in Oklahoma; the highest-numbered street in Austin, if I remember correctly, is 56½ Street. If you exit west from I-35 at 38½ Street, eventually (west of Red River Street, I believe) you will be diverted onto 38th, which in turn mutates into 35th. Visitors are perplexed; so are residents. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:55 AM to Driver's Seat
)
When it's easy being green
Oklahoma sits over a huge reservoir of natural gas, there are dozens of oil rigs drilling in the state, and we even have coal mines. Still, we're going to deplete our fossil fuels eventually the really cheap ones, anyway so OG&E's Wind Power program, small as it is for now, justifies the amount of hype it's getting. Of course, there's no way to guarantee that your little segment of the grid is going to be powered strictly by the Woodward turbine farm, and there's no way the utility can serve all of its customers with the 51-mW capacity available now. But if they can sell enough 100-kW units to individual customers to make a few bucks off the system we're obviously never going to lack for wind in this state there will be more turbines in the future, and presumably lower prices. And OG&E's nominal surcharge for wind power will largely be offset by a credit against the fuel-adjustment surcharge that's levied on the power they produce from gas or coal. I did the math, or at least as much math as I could do based on two weeks' worth of billing at the new place, and I decided to buy six of the 100-kW units, which will cost me about $3.60 a month, save me about $2.35 in fuel adjustments at the current rate, and, says the utility, reduce emissions of Nasty Gases by four and a half tons. It's hard to see any downside to this program. Granted, there are summer days in Oklahoma when the temperature is around 100 degrees and there isn't enough wind to motivate a tumbleweed, let alone spin a turbine, but my A/C doesn't care where the amps come from. And from my political point of view, it's still a boon: it's an environmental gesture that will actually accomplish something without a great deal of lifestyle adjustment, the Saudis don't make a dime off it, and if some passing bird is shredded over Woodward, it will annoy PETA. For a buck and a quarter a month, it's a hell of a deal. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:05 PM to Family Joules
)
Welcome to Fat City
Every year, Men's Fitness magazine rates the Top 25 Fit Cities and the Top 25 Fat Cities. Given our predilections here in the Okay City cheap smokes, rib joints, a general dislike for the Nanny State you'd probably expect us to be in the chub group, and you'd be right. In fact, we're movin' on up; after the ignominy of finishing 23rd last year, we've made it up to 13th this time around. What's changed in the last twelve months? Well, I moved into the city, and...um...well, I suppose I can always question the methodology. And after Detroit, which claims Numero Uno, four of the next five are in Texas, which surely is a sign of something. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:20 PM to City Scene
)
3 January 2004
Tort deform
Bruce talks about slapping a cap on damage awards in malpractice cases:
If a doctor commits a grievous error in your care you want to have the ability to receive compensation for that error. Do we really want to say that all errors are only worth $250,000 as one federal bill would have it? Think of your life and what its worth. Now think about the burdens your disability would have on your family should you lose your ability to work and care for yourself and you were only able to recoup $250,000 for that injury.
The drive for Tort Reform will not keep the insurance companies from looking for new ways to make a bigger profit. Remember that every business is a growth business. They just see paying out claims as a drag on their profitability and this rush to limit awards is a way to boost profitability at the expense of hurt people. They are punishing doctors as a way of putting pressure to get the legal action they want from politicians. (Emphasis added.) What we always hear about are the truly bizarre cases Cam Edwards talked about one this week on his radio show, some woman who suffered burns after spilling her coffee and sued Starbucks but using the man-bites-dog theory, I have to assume that these are the exception rather than the rule. There are, indeed, too many lawsuits, and many of them are indeed frivolous; but the truly useless suits can be handled with a loser-pays system. And thinning out the docket is, I think, the most important "reform" that needs to take place. The solution to high malpractice awards is simple: eliminate malpractice. The problem arises when you try to pin a workable definition onto the word, since medicine is at least as much art as it is science, and there's still a lot we don't know about everyday bodily functions. Sometimes all you can do is make an educated guess. I'd hate to think I could be sued for guessing wrong. On the other hand, outside the medical realm, sometimes it's clear that bungling or malfeasance is at fault. Here's a comment from a page linked by Bruce, posted by Angry Bear, that cuts to the chase:
My first thought was, "if frivolous lawsuits are so rare...why is there such a vociferous tort-reform movement?" But then an answer suggested itself: the issue is probably not so much the awards themselves as the actions that prospective awards deter. For example, action X may not be profitable if there's a 1 in 100 chance of getting caught and having to pay $5 million. But if the cap is $250 thousand (with the same 1/100 chance of getting caught) then action X may be profitable. (X represents things like polluting or not testing for safety.)
I hadn't really thought of it this way before that tort-reform isn't necessarily about avoiding big judgments for existing actions, but rather changing the range and extent of activities that firms can profitably undertake. Actions, conservatives are fond of saying, have consequences, and indeed they do. There's no reason that corporate entities should be exempt from the consequences of their actions, or to have their liability artificially limited, when individual persons are granted no such exemptions. The argument is made that numerous damage awards can destroy a company; I suggest that if a firm has actually done something to justify numerous damage awards, it may well deserve to be destroyed. Permalink to this item ( posted at 10:57 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
Freshly pressed
There's a new weekly newspaper in town, and "in town" is the operative phrase. The MidCity Advocate, published Thursdays, is your standard suburban community news/shopper with a twist: it's aimed, not at the suburbs, but at those of us who live in the 25 square miles of the central city. (Their coverage area runs from Portland to Kelley, Reno to 63rd.) This makes a certain amount of sense, since almost every other part of town is covered by a similar publication. One pitch made by the Advocate is the diversity of its readership: "The MidCity area has over 65,000 residents that span the socio-economic spectrum. There is a broad mix of income levels, ethnic diversity and education." No doubt about that. The National Register of Historic Places records fifteen districts in the county, and twelve of them are in this area; there are also, alas, some neighborhoods which can charitably be described as "rough". Still, what's true of the 'burbs is also true here in the city: most of us are here because this is where we want to be. I don't recognize any of the names on the masthead; evidently this is an entirely new bunch of folks. Sports Editor Jerry Spaeder admits to having roots in some place like Erie, Pennsylvania. I'm sort of hoping that the Advocate staff is here because this is where they want to be. Permalink to this item ( posted at 12:21 PM to City Scene
)
This side of parodies
Jessie Rosenberg, home from college for what used to be called the Christmas break, explains why it would be a waste of time to hold one of those affirmative-action bake sales at Bryn Mawr:
No one would understand the parody. Everyone would think that it's perfectly normal to charge different prices based on race, ethnicity, and sex.
This is not the situation for which Elvis Costello wrote, "I used to be disgusted / And now I try to be amused." But it fits. Permalink to this item ( posted at 3:16 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
4 January 2004
Talking Texan
The Dallas Morning News has selected George W. Bush as the Texan of the Year, which probably isn't that much of a surprise. There was some wailing and gnashing of teeth, to be sure the paper's blog printed a couple of reader comments that, shall we say, took exception to the selection but it's hard to argue with the conclusion of the announcement, written by Rod Dreher:
To honor Mr. Bush as Texan of the Year is not necessarily to endorse all his policies, nor is it to approve without question his governing style. It is, however, to recognize that there was in the past 12 months no more important Texan, and that the principles informing his fateful decisions over the course of a fateful year came from the mind of a man with roots deep in the heart of Texas.
And Keven Ann Willey, editorial-page editor, noted that some of the disagreements stemmed from the fact that, well, Bush wasn't born in Texas. (Before you ask: New Haven, Connecticut.) Not that this matters:
It's tough to argue that Bush isn't Texan. No, he wasn't born in the state, but he sure exudes its spirit with every breath, mannerism and utterance. The word "native" is commonly associated with one's birthplace, but note the first definition of "native" as a noun in Webster's: "One born OR reared in a particular local" emphasis added. Reared counts.
It's certainly fair to debate the merits of Bush's actions and policies, but debating his "Texan-ness," to my mind, is wasted energy. The Oklahoman has yet to announce an Oklahoman of the Year, though KTOK's Cam Edwards ran a phone poll last week, in which General Tommy Franks (who, incidentally, was born in Texas) was rather convincingly beating out OU quarterback and Heisman Trophy winner Jason White before the combination of my morning commute and the station's weird directional pattern dropped the program out of earshot. Permalink to this item ( posted at 12:02 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
Blogging in the abstract?
The newspaper blog is no longer a novelty. This does not necessarily portend a massive rush to commercially-operated blogs: some businesses don't really lend themselves to bloggage. (Of course, if someone does come up with, say, martysshellstation.com, please send me a link.) There are, however, quite a few real-estate blogs. Which makes sense, in a way; while most of us do business with them fairly rarely, the business that we do is immensely complicated and incredibly expensive, so to the extent that they're reaching out to us, they're doing us something of a favor by assisting us with our research. Of course, this is just icing on the commercial cake the motivation, first and foremost, is to build their own businesses but I'll happily take any crumbs I'm thrown that will help me with my side of the deal. (Inspired by The Great Team, an agency in the O.C. that both sells houses and blogs, and which admits to having read this assortment of screeds at least once.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 10:55 AM to Blogorrhea
)
And now, the news from Cockeysville
Sinclair Broadcast Group's News Central concept has been controversial from the beginning; in fact, last summer Sinclair's VP/General Counsel Barry Faber found himself defending the operation [requires Adobe Reader] before the presumably-skeptical Senate Commerce Committee. Well, I'd like to think I'm at least as skeptical as a Senator, so I figured the least I could do was to check out a News Central broadcast, which I did last night at 9 pm on Sinclair's KOKH-TV, the Fox affiliate in Oklahoma City. My most immediate reaction, actually, was marveling at the ingenuity of it all: the KOKH-TV news set is essentially identical to Sinclair's News Central set in Baltimore County, Maryland, and although you never see the local anchor and the News Central anchor sitting together trading quips given the amount of this that goes on at other local stations, I'm inclined to think this is an improvement it's never blatantly obvious that the newscast is pasted together from separate segments. (Take away 16 minutes from the hour for commercials, and the balance between national and local segments seems to be split about 3-2.) I have some concerns, most about weather: for instance, is the guy from AccuWeather, which provides the lion's share of News Central weather reportage, going to know about sudden storms out here in Tornado Alley fast enough to issue the appropriate warnings? Then again, none of the three big radio groups in town have any weather facilities of their own they rely on the local TV stations to provide their forecasts and updates so I have to assume that News Central has given the matter some thought, and next time we have spectacularly crappy weather (right now, it's merely cold), I will check. Then there's The Point, the commentary by Sinclair's VP/corporate relations Mark Hyman. Hyman leans decidedly right, which doesn't bother me; however, he has that patented Fox News snarkier-than-thou smirk, which does. (Note to television executives: If you're gonna rip off the Fox News Channel, rip off its most appealing feature: news babes in outfits that seem scantier than they really are.) I'm not sure how well this will play in markets less conservative than Oklahoma City, which is, well, almost all of them. Local news, as the estimable Laurence Simon reminds us, is intended as a profit center; any public-service considerations are secondary. Obviously Sinclair hopes to make its local newscasts profitable, and this is the path they've chosen. People with impeccable journalistic credentials will look at it and recoil in horror: "They've taken away the local angle!" I'm not so sure. If the "local angle" demands that three minutes be spent on interviewing the neighbor of someone who was shot by the cops which happened last night on some other station I'm happy to see it taken away. Permalink to this item ( posted at 1:41 PM to Dyssynergy
)
Madness, yet there is method
I haven't submitted anything to the BlogMadness competition, on the basis that my below-average material sucks, and my above-average material...um, sucks less. Then again, few authors (if I may borrow the term for a moment) are the best judges of their own work, so if you happen to think that something I posted in 2003 was worthwhile, leave a comment here or in email, and if there should be anything resembling a consensus between now and the 20th, I will duly submit the recommended piece. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:15 PM to Blogorrhea
)
5 January 2004
Neither do they spin
I have almost always been puzzled as to the reason why perfectly desirable women would willingly embrace the term "spinster," a word which to me has always seemed fraught with despair and desolation and all those other D words I used to toss around so frequently. After reading this, perhaps I understand a little better. I'm reasonably certain that not everyone using the term subscribes to every single item in the list, but I think they might buy this line:
We have a right to proudly reclaim the word Spinster, to uphold and forge this brave new identity, to embrace our singleness, to live our lives fully, and to never let our human expression be characterized as a paraphrased offshoot of the male experience with words such as "bachelorette."
Heh. She said "offshoot." Now maybe I should look for a comparable term for myself besides "dork," of course. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:26 AM to Table for One
)
An on-air boner
Somebody at the editing console at WFAA-TV in Dallas well, no, that's wrong, because apparently there wasn't anybody editing that day. You'll need Windows Media Player to see the actual video clip. (Via Cruel Site of the Day) Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:05 AM to Dyssynergy
)
Bad blood
One bomb burst of the bizarre this morning. NPR's Diane Rehm Show scheduled a program about the economic outlook, and Paul Krugman (Princeton professor and columnist for The New York Times) and Grover Norquist (head of Americans for Tax Reform) were booked; Krugman apparently said that he would not appear alongside Norquist. So Diane did the first half of the hour with Krugman, the second half with Norquist, and I'm wondering: have these guys been feuding lately? Krugman has occasionally sniped at Norquist, but I'm surprised things have gotten to such a state. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:45 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
Lessons from life (one in a series)
Neighborhood Association meeting tonight, and a better turnout than last month, but "It's only a block or so, I'll walk" makes a lot more sense when the temperature is above freezing, something it hasn't been since midday Sunday and probably won't be again until Wednesday noon. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:00 PM to Soonerland
)
6 January 2004
Branching out
Normally, if I write something, it's here, though over the years I have contributed a few product reviews to Epinions.com around $100 worth, in fact and scattered occasional comments on automotive message boards. Late last year, I was watching a DVD of a small indie film and for reasons unknown was motivated to write down my reaction and submit it to the Internet Movie Database. There is a backlog of submissions from amateur reviewers, so it's only just now that they've gotten around to mine; if you're at all curious as to how I'd respond to a "dark comedy of word games, sex, fantasy and Pop-Tarts," you're invited to visit the IMDb page for the 1999 film The Invisibles not at all related to Grant Morrison's comic series and stare in disbelief. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:21 AM to General Disinterest
)
A process to condemn
Michael Bates, a couple of weeks ago, decried a plan by the University of Tulsa to, in his words, "replace another Route 66 landmark with empty space." The University's favored tool is the power of eminent domain, as wielded by the City of Tulsa on the school's behalf:
If TU had acquired all its land from willing sellers, you could make the case that we have no place telling this private institution what to do with its own land. But TU has gained so much property through the unconstitutional use of eminent domain for private benefit, the least we should expect is that TU use its land efficiently.
Meanwhile, there's an effort in Colorado to curb this sort of thing. A bill being introduced into the Colorado legislature this week by Rep. Shawn Mitchell (R-Broomfield) would bar the use of eminent domain for private projects:
If the city or the state comes to take my land, it darn well better be for the city and state's public use a courthouse, a road, a school not just because they'd rather see someone doing something else on my land.
The Colorado Municipal League [link requires Adobe Reader], for its part, "opposes state and federal actions interfering with municipal authority concerning land use regulations." Of course they do.
Order in the court
Judge James Alexander had had it up to here with people appearing before the Oakland County (Michigan) Circuit Court in garb more suitable for putting up drywall. The court now has a dress code and some stricter rules of conduct, and violators may be sent home or worse. This action hasn't built any excitement in Pontiac just yet so far, Judge Alexander has sent just one person home to change but things should get interesting as temperatures rise and quantities of clothing diminish. (Via Dawn at Altered Perceptions) Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:43 AM to Almost Yogurt
)
How cold is it?
Well, it was 7 degrees Fahrenheit this morning, the coldest it's been since 3 March 2002. I bitched about it then, too. They promised us 40s tomorrow. Then again, they promised us 30s Monday and Tuesday, and we didn't get those either. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:37 PM to Weather or Not
)
The 2.29-night stand
VibeOK, the section of NewsOK.com that's aimed at young, happenin' kids (pardon me while I hurl), is asking, in the wake of the latest Britney Spears debacle: "If you could marry a pop star for 55 hours, who would it be?" A dozen choices (six male, six female) are offered, none of them especially inspiring, but if I had two days and change, I suppose the least annoying of the bunch would be Beyoncé Knowles, who is easy on the eyes and generally not known as a pain in the neck. On the other hand, I could think of a dozen bloggers more worthy of my time, though I am no more likely to win their hearts than Beyoncé's. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:59 PM to Almost Yogurt
)
7 January 2004
A new year of Carnival
The first Carnival of the Vanities for 2004 is hosted by American Realpolitik. This 68th edition continues the tradition of bringing you the best of the blogs for the past week, and even though I have an item in there this week, don't let that stop you from reading. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:36 AM to Blogorrhea
)
Coveting thy neighbor's stylebook
Last Minute Network Ltd, a British online travel vendor, managed to irritate some Web surfers with some pseudo-King James pitches; said surfers complained to the UK's Advertising Standards Association. A sample:
And on the sixth day Mary didst flee the office for a humbly priced trip to New York. And she shopp'd til she didst hobble in her kitten heels.
Not funny, especially, and, saith the ASA, not offensive, particularly. Which makes sense, I suppose: everyone talked like that in 1611. Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:59 AM to Dyssynergy
)
That man behind the curtain
For those who are accustomed to thinking of Donald Rumsfeld as an egomaniac, your reality check is in the mail. The Hill (no relation) is reporting that the SecDef had been Time's first choice for Person of the Year 2003, but he had other ideas; in November, when Time editors met with Rumsfeld at the Pentagon to talk war plans, the Secretary suggested, out of the blue, that the American soldier ought to be the magazine's choice for POTY. Did Rumsfeld suspect something? Was he just trying to spread a meme? It's probably impossible to know for sure, but surely this is not the act of a man with a serious lust for headlines. (Via Outside the Beltway) Permalink to this item ( posted at 3:02 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
Those who have gone before
There is a fair amount of dissatisfaction with the proposal for the World Trade Center Memorial, and Michele points to an example of How To Do It Right. In my back yard, more or less. Last year, the day before 9/11, I found myself at the Fence, where hundreds of small items left by visitors pay silent tribute to the victims of April 19. It is a genuinely moving place, perhaps the most heartbreaking (because it's the simplest) part of the Oklahoma City National Memorial, and if it should inspire someone working on the WTC project, so much the better. But I remember when I heard the bomb go off at 9:02, and while I'm always pleased to see my hometown recognized for providing a good example, I feel compelled to point out that the Fence, like the rest of the Memorial, is not for us; it's for the 168 friends and neighbors who were taken away in that frightening collision of madness and evil. The WTC planners would do well to remember that their first job is to honor the victims of 9/11, not to produce, as Michele says, "a piece of concept art." Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:35 PM to City Scene
)
8 January 2004
But not for U
If you show up at U-Haul with a Ford Explorer, you will leave without the trailer you were planning to tow; The Detroit News is reporting that U-Haul International has forbidden its 17,000 local outlets to rent trailers to Explorer owners, citing ongoing lawsuits involving America's largest-selling sport-utility vehicle. The ban applies to all model years, despite the fact that most of the litigation, including the Firestone debacle, involved the previous generation of the Explorer; Ford redesigned the truck for 2003 with an independent rear suspension, which enhances handling and lowers the center of gravity. Curiously, the Mercury Mountaineer, which is basically the Explorer with a brushed-aluminum interior and the top-line powertrain, is not included in the ban. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:48 AM to Driver's Seat
)
Not exactly like a prayer
Okay, 'fess up: How many of you were playing wait-and-see with Wesley Clark, holding off until he got an endorsement from Madonna? Yeah, that's what I thought. Permalink to this item ( posted at 1:05 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
Number, please
The Federal Communications Commission has called AT&T Wireless on the carpet for falling down on number portability; the Death Star, meanwhile, is telling customers that there may be as much as a five-day delay in moving numbers between cell carriers. When it doesn't take six weeks, that is. Permalink to this item ( posted at 3:09 PM to Dyssynergy
)
Awash in schwag
We got merchandise, by gum. Arriving through the slender slot in the door: Bigwig's ingenious campaign sticker, telling the world what he (and I) think of the Democrats' favorite son of And stuffed under the welcome mat, to the extent that a ten-inch cube can be stuffed under anything flat: Brother Dave's Better Living Through Blogging mug, in the charmingly-retro distaff version. I feel indescribably rich, in a budget-minded sort of way. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:13 PM to Blogorrhea
)
First official home repair
One of those talk-show guys is fond of saying, "If you have a home, you have home repairs." This is, of course, not something I want to think about, but if I'm to avoid being at the mercy of some guy in a battered pickup truck, I need to be able to do some of the simpler tasks myself. Problem: Extremely loose toilet handle requires jiggling in any position and for any function. Solution: Replace handle/actuator lever. (Float valve was judged to be working correctly.) Tool used: Vise-Grip, to remove old (and somewhat grungy) apparatus. Time to fix: 6 minutes, not counting trip to Home Depot. Cost: $4.28. I feel better already. Okay, this isn't exactly retrieving the Beagle 2, but frankly, I'd rather not face something incredibly serious just yet. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:49 PM to Surlywood
)
9 January 2004
It's a two-man race
That's what Wesley Clark's campaign people are saying, citing a new poll in Oklahoma that shows the general trailing Democratic frontrunner Howard Dean by a mere three percentage points, within the predicted margin of error. (Joe Lieberman is a distant third; the others don't matter.) The Oklahoma primary is 3 February. I've scheduled a dental appointment for that date in anticipation. Registration closes this afternoon. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:17 AM to Soonerland
)
It's been a long time
Happy 60th (!) birthday, Jimmy Page. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:12 AM to Tongue and Groove
)
Let us all now veg out
Baldilocks reads the terms of the Official Salads Act:
Anyone who uses iceberg lettuce in a salad should be shot.
Croutons and bacon bits are masks for a salad prepared by a lazy salad-maker. If your ingredients are good, fresh and varied, you don't need that caca. No yellow, orange or white dressings should be used. Hey, if you want to hide the taste of your salad, just tear up some iceberg, chop up a big, fat tomato and pour Thousand Island all over it. Blech. Thousand Island has always struck me as overwrought, though it's difficult to find variations in the range of, say, 350 to 600 Island. Other than that, I think I'd be fortunate to score higher than a D-plus on this admittedly strict set of requirements. And that's a shame, because:
If you think salads are boring, you're missing out on one of the great pleasures of eating. Time, attention and varied ingredients are all that are required. Don’t forget to make it beautiful as well. Eating is almost as much about the eye as it is about the tongue.
Mental note: This is probably not the ideal day to hit the drive-thru at Whataburger. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:23 AM to Worth a Fork
)
Dennis gazes skyward
NEW ROME, OH (WATSO*): Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich today lashed out at the Bush administration's space-exploration proposals, calling them "ill-advised" and "unnecessarily bellicose." "The very idea of going to Mars," said the former Ohio Congressman, "encapsulates everything that's wrong with George Bush. In the first place, it's a red planet. This is yet another example of the Bush administration's schemes to reward its friends and punish its enemies. There is no evidence that Karl Rove, or any of Bush's advisers, made the slightest effort to locate a blue planet for exploration." Another problem, said Kucinich, is the nature of Mars itself. "It's the planet of war. How many times must we go through this? War, war, war. It's the only thing George Bush knows." The Kucinich campaign has yet to release formally any alternative plan for space exploration, but the candidate hinted at some of the ideas he'd like to see in such a plan. "We're looking towards Venus, which is, after all, a planet of women, who have been cruelly underrepresented in the space program up to now, and then, perhaps in our second term, Vulcan, where war and hatred have been replaced by reason and logic. As Americans, we deserve no less." *With apologies to Scott Ott
Riding that drain
First city utility bill has arrived, and it's a monster: $135.71, though about $76 of it seems to be refundable deposits of various sorts, and there's $20 for a service initiation fee. This suggests that until Heavy Lawn Watering begins, I'm looking at $40ish water/garbage/sewage bills every month, which isn't exactly horrendous. Once I recovered my composure, I noticed something marked "Drainage Fee Fee Due To Unfunded EPA Mandate." Needless to say, I had to track this down, and here's the scoop:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now enforces strict storm water drainage regulations.
The monthly "drainage fee" is to pay for work we must do to meet these new EPA drainage standards and requirements. The regulations are the result of a federal mandate to clean up pollution from storm water which drains into rivers, lakes and streams. Washington did not provide any money to pay for meeting the requirements. Every large city in the United States must spend local money millions of dollars to avoid crippling fines. Of course, "unfunded mandate," if you say it loudly enough, becomes a buzzword. And it's said quite a bit, now that the Feds seem comfortable with handing out regulations without regard to cost. Still, absent evidence to the contrary, I am going to assume that this particular mandate is something that needs to be, or at least ought to be, done, and will pay my $3.82 (up from $2.73, unless this is prorated in some strange manner) with a smile and only slightly clenched teeth. Permalink to this item ( posted at 5:29 PM to Surlywood
)
10 January 2004
The Brattleboro catechism
Rod Dreher, on The Dallas Morning News blog (scroll down to 9 January, 4:49 pm), sees some inconsistencies in Howard Dean's sudden spirituality:
He said that President Bush had no business making a stem-cell policy decision based in part on religious belief even though Dean said just the other day that his religious faith guided his decision to approve civil unions for gays.
Here's the Dean Doctrine: The Lord Your God permits you to make faith in Him a factor in policy decisions, but only if the outcome is politically liberal. There are times when I suspect the only book of Scripture Dr. Dean has read is Numbers.
Just fading away
Alfred Pugh has died in Bay Pines, Florida. According to the Veterans Administration, he was the oldest American veteran who had been wounded in combat. Pugh, who spoke both French and English, served in World War I as an infantryman who doubled as interpreter, and was taken out by a mustard-gas blast in the Argonne. "We didn't get gas masks," he said, "until the day after it happened." The French subsequently elected him to the Légion d'Honneur with rank of Chevalier. The VA says about three hundred American WWI veterans are still alive. Al Pugh survived the mustard gas, but it was something else that got to his lungs that killed him: pneumonia. He was a week and a half short of his 109th birthday. I thank him, as I thank all our troops. Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:06 AM to Almost Yogurt
)
Fuel for the sole
Jennifer Alfano, in the February Harper's Bazaar:
The following statistic will either make you laugh with guilt-tinged understanding or cause you to think I am a victim of mass consumption. $23,159. It is not the sum left on my mortgage; it is the amount I have spent on shoes in the past eight years not including sneakers, flip-flops (except one Hermès pair) or the dozens of shoes I've tired of and parted with.
Quite apart from the fact that twenty-three K would make a huge hole in my mountain of debt, this is a fairly startling number, if only because I don't think I've spent that much on all items of clothing combined in the thirty-two years I've had to buy my own. Then again, sixteen pages away in the same issue, "Shoes of the Season" features six pair one supposedly must have, and having them will cost a total of $3510. What's worse, none of them, at least to my eyes, seem all that compelling; the best of the bunch, a rounded-throat pump from Prada, earns that status merely by having no blatantly hideous faults. (Manolo Blahnik is conspicuous in this group by his absence, and I didn't see any flip-flops, from Hermès or anyone else.) This is, I suppose, one of those things I'm not supposed to understand, like the item I found today in the supermarket labeled "Free Range Chicken Broth". How the hell did they get it into the can? Permalink to this item ( posted at 4:39 PM to Rag Trade
)
The quiz you've all been waiting for
And this time, you get to see the, um, inner workings, because it doesn't do the math for you. Ready? Which Democratic primary candidate are you in bed? (Not suitable for all ages or workplaces; via Doc Searls.) What's that? Oh, me? I'm an intriguing (or possibly nauseating) mix of Joe Lieberman and Carol Moseley-Braun. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:29 PM to Dyssynergy
)
11 January 2004
Girl on film
Aldahlia says she's "an honest to God movie snob of massive proportions," and maybe it's true:
I pick movies apart with a rabidity I've never seen in anyone else, ever. I watch movies in a way that's so obnoxious, I've had friends bring strangers over, so that they can witness just how obscene and disturbing my type of movie consumption really is.
You don't want to watch a movie with me, trust me. I can ruin just about any cinematic experience. As for justifying it, I really can't. It's something I do compulsively. Mine is not to wonder why. Mine is to point out even the most minute flaws. Mine is to read things into fairly generic flicks that I should never have thought to begin with. Having once castigated a radio station for playing a hacked-together edit of Tommy James' "Crimson and Clover" instead of the proper single version or even (heaven help us) that absurd quasi-psychedelic LP mix, I suspect I am in no position to grumble here. And besides, if everything (and everyone) were perfect, we'd be bored out of our skulls. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:53 AM to Almost Yogurt
)
Sweet silver angel
With an assist from Dawn Eden, I have learned that Rhino's Handmade division has reissued the two albums by the late Judee Sill, the first of which has been a valued part of my collection for over thirty years. Judee Sill was the very first LP issued under David Geffen's Asylum imprint, then distributed by Atlantic. Her earlier songs listed a copyright by Blimp Music, the Turtles' publishing unit; indeed, the Turtles had cut a version of her "Lady-O" in late 1969, which charted at #78. But nothing here is truly Flo-and-Eddie-esque; Sill's songs are sort of what you might get if you replaced Joni Mitchell's frustrated eroticism (see For the Roses, Mitchell's first release for Asylum) with a spirituality that's part Sixties cosmic, part traditional Christian, and if that seems perhaps contradictory, here's the chorus of "My Man on Love":
One star remains in the false darkness
Have you met my man on love? One truth survives death's silent starkness Have you met my man on love? Most of the songs center on Sill's voice and guitar, but "Jesus Was a Cross Maker", the intended single (and produced, unlike the rest of the LP, by Graham Nash), borrows the gospel-piano style to stirring effect. It did not chart, and the album was a relative stiff; two years later, Heart Food went largely unnoticed. A friend of hers once quoted Judee Sill as saying that she would become famous and die before she was forty. She made it to thirty-five before the drugs took their toll; "famous," of course, is open to discussion. Certainly she's remembered here and there, and I'm not above dropping her name when the circumstances permit. (And, of course, I'm grateful to Dawn for providing some circumstances.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:03 AM to Tongue and Groove
)
Second (Amendment) thoughts
Ravenwood reports that Cleveland's daily newspaper isn't taking Ohio's new concealed-carry law lightly: The Plain Dealer plans to print the names of all Ohioans receiving permits under the new law. Once they do, vow the operators of the Web site Keep and Bear Arms, they will print the names of all Ohioans who work for The Plain Dealer. Ravenwood, in the spirit of this response, has opened the volley with the details on the newspaper's editor, who lives in one of those spiffy neighborhoods practically right on the lake. Meanwhile, The Columbus Dispatch is very unhappy that the state won't be releasing the names of permit-holders to the general public; of course, what really disturbs the Dispatch is that permits will be issued in the first place. Most state concealed-carry laws are what is called "shall-issue" laws; that is, it is not left to the discretion of local authorities to decide whether to issue a permit. Unless there is some specific legal reason to disqualify an applicant, his permit is to be approved. Most states, including Ohio once their law goes into effect in April, do have prerequisites which must be met, but in a shall-issue state, if those prerequisites are met, the permit is issued, and that's that. This fact itself annoys a lot of people, among them the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which annually hands out usually-failing report cards to the individual states and this year gave Oklahoma a D-minus [link requires Adobe Reader] for, among other things, having a "shall-issue" law. Only they put it this way:
Oklahoma also forces police to let people carry hidden handguns in public.
Imagine that. Police are forced to let people carry guns. "Why, when I was younger, the police didn't have to let you do a damn thing; they could pull you over for any reason they wanted, and we liked it." Yeah, sure. When the grandchildren ask me "What made you join the National Rifle Association, anyway?" I'll give them that White Album nonsense about being the all-American bullet-headed Saxon mother's son, and then I'll probably just let them read this post. (Update, 13 January, 1:15 pm: Xrlq [20 points in Scrabble®] disposes of the Dispatch.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 1:19 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
Paths that cross yet again
Last time I was in Oklahoma City's Full Circle Bookstore, I spent rather a lot of the time swapping stories with an old friend. Now that I've moved into the middle of town, the store is only a mile from me, so I figured the least I could do was reacquaint myself with its combination of virtues and quirks (it's the last independent bookseller in the state with anything resembling an extensive inventory; the books are shelved literally up to the ceiling, which means either eyestrain or summoning a staff member more often than you would in one of the chains; its owner is running for Mayor). This afternoon, I did have to have one book procured for me, though this was due to my failure to comprehend the filing system who would have thought that a personal memoir might be filed under "Biography"? and I spent rather a lot of the time swapping stories with an old friend. Kurt "Captain And" Lochner, like me (and like author Brian A. Hopkins and occasional reader/commenter/philosopher W. Terkish Payne) a member of the old Lair Security, Inc. BBS Überclique back in the day, caught me just south of the north entrance. Neither one of us believed it at first. We traded information on where the others had gone unsurprisingly, he'd kept closer tabs than had I and made fun of losers. It was quite an experience, especially since both of us seemed to look better than we used to. (Take that, entropy!) Now I wonder who will pop up next time I'm in the store. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:32 PM to General Disinterest
)
The Perl of the Clark campaign
Wesley Clark's campaign staff have developed, or commissioned, or otherwise come up with, a ClarkBot, which scans Feedster's RSS search engine every day looking for references to the General and then posts them to a section of the campaign blog. It's picked up pretty much everything I've ever said about the man, and if you're blogging and have an RSS feed, likely everything you've ever said about him either. The bot doesn't attempt to pass judgment on whether the comment is favorable or not; it simply reproduces the item and posts a link. At the bottom of the page is this useful advice:
Please use this as a resource for rapid response to attacks on Clark, and leave some encouraging comments at bloggers who support Clark. As always, be civil even to those critics of the General who are not civil themselves.
Seems reasonable to me. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:33 PM to Blogorrhea
)
12 January 2004
And the days go by
I note in passing that I got married twenty-six years ago today, in the middle of a blizzard. Today: sunshine and 58, and I suspect both of us are happier four hundred miles apart. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:28 AM to Table for One
)
Seven inches every time
Dear Michele: No matter where you go, you'll find that it's the finest folks who have preserved their 45s for posterity. Of course, posterity doesn't always appreciate our gifts, but so what else is new?
Joe talks taxes
Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman came to Tulsa today, pitching his tax plan, which he says will cut taxes for 98 percent of the middle class, whoever they may be these days, while raising taxes on the top few and somehow balancing the budget. I'm not entirely convinced there are enough taxpayers among those top few to make up the deficit if you took every dime from Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, you'd leave them broke and you'd still have $250 billion or so to collect and next year's deficit would remain untouched but at least he's offering, beyond the usual platitudes, some actual numbers to play with. Permalink to this item ( posted at 2:45 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
Now how much would you pay?
If you've got a spare $10,130 burning a hole in your pocket, you can come live next door to me for a year. I've been avoiding asking the owner just how much he wanted to rent the place, but someone pulled one too many information sheets out of the little plastic tube, and the extra one was found lodged just this side of my flower bed, and thus informed, I pass the details on to you. What you get: Three bedrooms, two bathrooms, central heat and air, washer/dryer connections, 1550 square feet of space by whatever arcane mathematics they use to determine such things, decently huge back yard, the dubious privilege of living next door to me. What you don't get: A garage (this one has been converted to actual living space), much of a view. What they want: Twelve-month lease, $650 deposit, $790 a month. What they don't want: Smokers, pet owners, Section 8. I haven't been inside, but the outside is pretty decent, and it's a block and a half to the grade school, if that matters to you. Permalink to this item ( posted at 5:20 PM to Surlywood
)
13 January 2004
There go the carbs
Marietta, Oklahoma is known for basically one thing: cookies. This week, no cookies: Bake-Line Group, the national baking conglomerate founded by former Keebler officers, Marietta's largest employer, has closed all seven of its bakeries and announced plans to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. About 300 people out of Marietta's population of 2300 worked for Bake-Line. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:23 AM to Soonerland
)
Who says we can't?
Emperor Misha can give you lots of reasons why the President's it's-not-really-amnesty plan is something less than wonderful, but the argument that truly knots the Imperial BVDs is the one that goes like this:
"But we CAN'T deport 8 million illegals, that's just IMPOSSIBLE!"
Oh, yeah?
The word "impossible" is, quite possibly, the most un-American word that I've ever heard, it's the very embodiment of what has turned Europe into the bilge of the civilized word.
And that's just ONE argument. It's just as idiotic as saying that it's simply "impossible" to abolish And Spoons attacks the same premise from a different angle entirely:
Once you accept that income taxes should be at least 50%, then your spectrum of tax policy options shrinks mightily. Once you accept that the Constitution requires Affirmative Action, then your spectrum of policy options shrinks mightily. Of course, if you don't accept these things....
The President is buying a dubious premise: we can't really do anything about the however many million illegals we already have, so let's do something with that all-important "feel-good" quality, preferably before the election. His options, shall we say, have shrunk mightily. Nothing particularly unusual about this motivation, but it's still disheartening to see it. Besides, the word that counts here isn't the word that's said, which is "can't", but the word that's meant, which is "won't". If we're going to take this war-on-terror stuff seriously, we have to have control of our borders, not because Mexico is sending us terrorists they aren't but because any weak point can and will be exploited by terrorists. So long as the borders remain porous, so long as there is little or no fear of deportation, Homeland Security is nothing more than a guy in a suit with a bunch of paint chips. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:30 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
Degrees of insanity
Is it just me, or is Mike suffering brain freeze? Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:26 PM to Soonerland
)
Potrzebie party
Mad #438 (February) is hyping its fake letter from Michael Jackson, but the spread you have to see is a six-page satire by Jeff Kruse called "The League of Rejected Superheroes". It's decent enough, but what makes it work is that Mad somehow managed to snag some Big-Name Artists. (Yeah, I know, Mad is a corporate cousin to DC Comics, but still, there's some sort of Wall of Separation between them.) Frank Miller introduces you to Inebrion, a superhero who has had one or two or a quadrillion too many. J. Scott Campbell shows you Scantily-Clad Woman, for whom "wonderbra" is more than a mere brand name. Dave Gibbons presents the Entomologist, who apparently was bitten by a radioactive tortoise at the zoo while he was trying to get the attention of some of the spiffier bugs. (No relation to Dr. Weevil.) John Byrne illustrates Mediocre Man, so far the only superhero who acquired his powers through a Sally Struthers home-study course. John Romita, Jr. gives us Sloggtor of Globbzorr, who is apparently fortysomething and divorced. Michael Allred delineates Vocabulon, to whom sesquipedalianism is just the beginning. Arthur Adams found time to draw Apathenia, Queen of Not Giving a Damn, who first appeared in BFD Comics back in 1993. And finally, from the pen of Jim Lee, The Incredible Infringement Man, who...what's that? Any more and I'll have to pay royalties? (Actually, I just wanted to get something up on this before Four Color Hell found out.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 10:09 PM to Almost Yogurt
)
14 January 2004
None so fine as 69
This was as clean a slogan as we could come up with for my high-school graduating class, which was, indeed, the class of '69. In the meantime, I'm happy to exhume the phrase for Carnival of the Vanities #69, brought to you nine minutes at a time by Snooze Button Dreams, incorporating the Best of the Blogs, plus something of mine to level the playing field. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:36 AM to Blogorrhea
)
Et tu, Subaru?
The pavement-inhaling WRX aside, Subaru, perhaps more than any other automotive marque, gets respect from the Greener Than Thou crowd, inasmuch as it makes generally sensibly-sized vehicles which eschew the more egregious frills one finds on other brands; Fuji Heavy Industries, the manufacturer, is viewed as the Anti-Detroit. (The fact that General Motors owns a small chunk of Fuji is either overlooked or ignored.) So there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth when word gets around that there will be just enough modifications made to the 2005 edition of Subaru's popular Outback wagon and sedan to qualify them under Federal regulations as light trucks, subject to a less-stringent fuel-economy standard. The reason for this is blindingly simple: there's a horsepower race on, and Subaru doesn't want to be left behind. The wagon, at least, might pass for a truck, given the proliferation of crossover quasi-SUVs, but the sedan? (Via Autoextremist.com) Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:54 AM to Driver's Seat
)
Snooze-a-lanche?
Carnival #69 from Snooze Button Dreams is sending a fairly huge number of people to this site, startling in view of the lame attempt at humor I submitted for inclusion this week. If you've just arrived here and the offending item has scrolled away, this is the drone you're looking for. Permalink to this item ( posted at 3:09 PM to Blogorrhea
)
It's in the paper, it must be true
A filler item in The Oklahoman read like this:
Area Social Security recipients are being advised to log on to the correct Internet site when seeking information about their Social Security benefits or Medicare services.
Larry Jones, public affairs specialist with Social Security in Oklahoma City, said residents may be misled by private firms that advertise on the Internet that they can provide replacement Social Security cards or other services for a fee. There should be no charge for those services, Jones said. He advised residents to log on to the official site at www.socialsecurity.org for information and free services. As noted by yours truly back in March 1998, www.socialsecurity.org is the Cato Institute's privatization page. I would advise area Social Security recipients to log on to the correct Internet site when seeking information about their Social Security benefits or Medicare services. Permalink to this item ( posted at 3:42 PM to Dyssynergy
)
Get thee behind me, Chase
Back in October, commenting on a big bank merger, I said this:
If there's a bank you'd like to see bought out, write to their credit-card department and have them send me an application.
Needless to say, this was before J. P. Morgan Chase put up $58 billion for Bank One. That bit about not putting all your eggs in one basket doesn't at all anticipate that the baskets might want them there. (About that title: Back in the pre-Morgan days, Chase had a brief advertising campaign to the effect of "Put The Chase behind you," usually with someone who isn't really a businessman but who plays one on TV saying something like "When I need to expand, I put The Chase behind me." One of our language pundits, probably either Edwin Newman or William Safire, pointed out that putting something behind you had an entirely different meaning to some people: "Thank God, I never have to bank there again!") Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:25 PM to Common Cents
)
A completely unique experience
Well, okay, it wasn't that unique, but Rammer and I bent a couple of brewskis and bemoaned the sad state of Damn Near Everything this evening, which meant that we had to do some rather speedy bemoaning. I don't think he quite grasps the Oklahoma Zeitgeist just yet, but then hardly do I, and I've been here thirty years or so. Still, it was good to see the guy, and being a long way from home, he may well have thought it was good to be seen. We'll have to do this again sometime. Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:29 PM to Blogorrhea
)
15 January 2004
Hizzoner to be
Four men will be on next month's ballot to select a Mayor for Oklahoma City, to fill the last two years of the term vacated by Kirk Humphreys. The presumed front-runner, at least for now, is Ward 1 Councilman Mick Cornett ("one of the rich Cornetts," Susanna might say); challenging are former Ward 1 Councilman F. O. "Frosty" Peak, bookstore owner Jim Tolbert, and Marcus Hayes, director of social services of a local senior center. The ballot is nonpartisan; a runoff if needed will be held in April. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:22 AM to City Scene
)
Jacket fluff
Erica is irked by the ubiquitous term "bestseller":
Is it just me, or is every book a "bestseller" for at least five minutes? Hearing that a book is a bestseller doesn't really make it that much more interesting for me. "Bestseller" tells me "it's a really good seller like all those other books."
And possibly "We shipped so many of these books that it's got to be a hit, and by the time they're remaindered, nobody will remember what we said anyway." Besides, book quality and book sales have a tangential relationship at best. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:41 AM to Almost Yogurt
)
It's just a little prick
A bill to legalize tattooing in South Carolina has passed the state Senate, and a longtime opponent in the House has apparently dropped his opposition, pending the adoption of his recommended amendment. Should the Palmetto State make body art legal, it will be the 49th state to do so. I need hardly point out who's holding out. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:20 AM to Dyssynergy
)
Let the machine get it
What's the worst possible telephone number you can imagine? If the first thing you come up with is 867-5309, you might want to check with these folks. (Courtesy of my infamous old pal Dull N. Boring. No credit for knowing what the N is for.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 5:22 PM to Dyssynergy
)
16 January 2004
Side, meet thorn
These days, it is an article of faith one might even call it a faith-based article that academics of a conservative bent are this close to being on the Endangered Species List, and that the leftists in charge would be gleeful at the possibility of their extinction. As with most stereotypes, there's a kernel of truth somewhere within, and the example I know best comes from right here in Soonerland, where Professor David Deming of the University of Oklahoma, who has run afoul of the Forces of Political Correctness before, claimed on KWTV this week that his academic career has been stymied by higher-ups who object to his manifest conservatism. (There is, at least temporarily, a RealPlayer video clip at NewsOK.com.) Dr Deming last galvanized the opposition against him in 2000, when a Yale Daily News piece by student Joni Kletter was reprinted locally. Kletter argued that "easy access to a handgun allows everyone in this country...to quickly and easily kill as many random people as they want." Deming sent a letter to the Oklahoma Daily, suggesting that similarly, women in general and Kletter in particular have the capacity, because of "easy access" to sexual equipment, to have sex with random people and that he hoped Kletter was "as responsible with her equipment as most gun owners are with theirs." Not the most subtle of analogies, but Deming made his point, and was duly punished for it. A couple of dozen complaints were filed with the University's Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action. The University, seeing it as a First Amendment issue, dismissed the complaints. The complainants appealed the dismissal, and the University scheduled a hearing; under pressure from local media and from the Center for Individual Rights, which was preparing to sue the University on Deming's behalf, the charges were dropped once again. It seems reasonable to believe, though, that there are still people seething over the fact that Deming is still teaching at OU. Dr John Dean, then dean of the College of Geophysics, had written Deming over the Kletter affair, to this effect:
In the future, when you enter into public discussion on controversial social issues, I ask that you weigh fully the non-trivial costs and consequences to the individuals with whom you work and the institutions which provide you a professional home.
Dr Dean is still Deming's boss. (Update, 18 January, 8 pm: Deming says he has lost a class and has been banished to a basement office.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:43 AM to Soonerland
)
First things first
Alison Jane's Frolic and Detour reminds us of the purpose and the limitations of that "freedom of speech" business:
Nobody invented the First Amendment to make sure that no matter what you thought, or said, or said about what you thought, nothing would happen to you. The federal constitution was not written so that no one would call you on your bullshit. It doesn't mean there aren't costs. Think free verse, not free beer.
In fact, if everyone lived this way cowering from conflict and argument, afraid to say no, afraid to thwart anyone's id or step on their buzz or imply that what they just said was the stupidest thing we ever heard, or that we will never listen again to a radio station or read a newspaper that would continue to employ them it would destroy, not serve, the spirit of the First Amendment. You're supposed to participate. You're supposed to get in there and argue, and sometimes, when it really matters, you're supposed to make it expensive or unpleasant or uncomfortable to be wrong. That's why the government doesn't do it. The guys in the wigs expected the rest of us to deal with you. The entire notion of the First Amendment is that in the marketplace of ideas, the morons will go broke. If you insist on buying from them out of some twisted notion of equity or community or "judge not, lest ye be judged," you are failing the system. Emphasis added. I figure most of you already knew this, but it bears repeating. Permalink to this item ( posted at 10:50 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
After Rowland, what?
The California Yankee is not inclined to cut Connecticut Governor John G. Rowland any slack:
It is truly amazing how little support there is for Rowland at the moment. No one I know has a kind word to say for him. The press, tasting blood, is extremely persistent. I can't imagine how Rowland can distract them.
Well, I did find one kind word, from Mike Alissi, publisher of Reason, who offers a modest defense of the governor:
I've always liked Rowland for one reason: The guy has maintained a relatively low media profile over the years. That's a decent indication he hasn't been too active meddling in our lives (notwithstanding his recent signature on a bill to ban smoking in all bars). This is in sharp contrast to do-gooder politicians like, say, Bill Bennett's preachy pal, Sen. Joe Lieberman, and even more so to Dick Blumenthal (Lieberman's successor as Attorney General) who will sue anybody to get in front of a camera.
The gov's media profile is, um, a bit higher now. But this is bad press that fuels the public's contempt for politicians who abuse power. That's a positive thing. I just hope people save some skepticism for the next elected governor (who very well may be Dick Blumenthal) and they remember that shiny clean do-gooder politicians can abuse power as much as corrupt ones, only in different ways. Okay, one Connecticut resident on Rowland's side. Sort of. Permalink to this item ( posted at 4:21 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
17 January 2004
Going their separate ways
In 1977, the two Cincinnati daily newspapers, Gannett's Enquirer and E. W. Scripps' Post, entered a Joint Operating Agreement, under which they would maintain separate news operations but pool their advertising and circulation functions. The agreement was for ten years, and would be automatically renewed unless one of the two parties opted out with three years' notice. The Department of Justice approved the deal in 1979. Gannett has now officially informed Scripps that they are opting out, that the JOA will end at the end of 2007. Evening papers in general have been in decline; Post circulation today is one-quarter what it was when the deal with the Enquirer was struck. What may save the Post is its strength south of the Ohio River, where a separate Kentucky Post edition is circulated for readers in northern Kentucky. The next two JOAs up for renewal are in Birmingham, Alabama and Tucson, Arizona: both expire in 2015. Permalink to this item ( posted at 11:48 AM to Almost Yogurt
)
PL8S that GR8
From Miscellaneous, Etc., a Friday Five item engages the Rage Reflex:
If I had vanity plates on my car, they would read, "SUCKBAD", because I hate vanity plates so much that I think I might piss myself right now.
It's not that I hate the people who have vanity plates, it's just that I don't understand what they're thinking when they get them. Either they're so compressed that they make highschool yearbook entries seem lucid by comparison, or else they're so self-aggrandizing that you wish you could just ram them right there on the road. Yes, you people with "RICHGUY" or "HOTCHIK" or "KIKASS" on your sports cars or luxury vehicles, I'm talking to you. From the make and model of your car, I was already able to figure out that you had a lot of money and I didn't even have to put on my detective's eyes! Are you really so concerned that I might miss the fact that you're wealthy that you have to advertise it on your own license plate? Is it such an issue that you need to put it right out there in public? Are you so bereft of communication channels that this is all that's left to you? Of course, here in Oklahoma, we're more interested in suing over license plates than in agonizing over them, but maybe it's because they cost so much here to begin with that we're disinclined to spend the extra $25 or so. For the record, I briefly entertained the idea of a vanity plate "DCXXVI", if you're curious but decided I would likely get rear-ended by some fool on the Belle Isle Bridge trying to decipher the damned thing. Permalink to this item ( posted at 1:58 PM to Dyssynergy
)
Are the Democrats doomed?
Mike Taibbi, in the New York Press, asserts that "voters are repulsed by weakness," and, by extension, the Democrats as we know them:
[T]he Party, as currently constructed, will never be able to get around this problem. Why? Because weakness is inherent in the party’s ideology.
There are only two ways to appear strong. One is to stand for something. The other is to kick ass. Today’s Democrats most emphatically are not equipped to do either. On the standing-for-something front, that question was settled long ago. Nothing can be more obvious than that the current Democratic leadership considers actual principle a laughable electoral weakness. This was demonstrated most forcefully a few weeks ago when Hillary Clinton joked about Mohatma Gandhi having worked in a St. Louis gas station. If Gandhi were running in this race, the Democratic Leadership Council bet on it would be warning of a McGovern-like landslide defeat. Democrats consider strength to be the skillful capture of swing votes via the tactically precise execution of a fuzzy policy of standing for nothing at all, as in the case of Bill Clinton. Okay, they don't stand for anything. Can they kick ass?
As it stands, the Republicans are tougher than the Democrats because they will not hesitate to bomb the hell out of anyone, provided that the target cannot meaningfully fight back. But here's the thing: The Republicans are not interested in ruling other countries, any more than they are interested in ruling the United States. All they really want to do is make money. They only use military force insofar as it is necessary to a) extract another country's resources, and b) ensure that these countries become and remain markets for American products. Beyond these parameters, they're amazingly squeamish about using the military.
This may explain why there's been only the faintest rattling of sabres in the general direction of Pyongyang: North Korea, absent its smallish collection of fungible nukes, can't afford so much as a Brown Bag Special at Sonic. What to do? Taibbi suggests that an upcoming Democratic administration, assuming there will be an upcoming Democratic administration within any of our lifetimes, leverage what perceived advantage they may have in domestic affairs the GOP owns foreign policy and simply annex the rest of the world, thereby making everything effectively (or, knowing the Democrats, ineffectively) domestic. Pax americana, here we come. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:31 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
18 January 2004
In the right place
The rental next door is still vacant, but across the street and one down, there's a sale. After the owner sank some serious dollars into refurbishing the place and then sat by the phone for a month of FSBOing, he finally bit the bullet and called in an Expert, who promptly sold the place in half a week. As everyone knows, the three major guiding principles of real estate are location, location, and location, perhaps in that very order. But in my case, at least, to make the deal work, it also took research, elbow grease, and good ol' dumb luck. I wouldn't be at all surprised to hear the same story from the new folks on the block when they get here. Permalink to this item ( posted at 5:44 AM to Surlywood
)
Words to blog by
Christy at Digital Nirvana follows, she says, the Bushido Way of the Blogger:
Mental discipline (heck, love is a mental discipline by the way). Blog everyday. Be one with the written word. Honor and respect other blogger's ideas. Self-control. Truth and sincerity. Karma. I didn't name this blog Digital Nirvana without those precepts in mind.
My ultimate goal as a blogger is not to get as many hits as possible, be linked to a million weblogs out there or God forbid, ram my ideas down people's throats. My primary motivation is self-enlightenment and introspection. I believe the words that I write reflect my essence and my soul and many times I've faltered by going down to my lesser, baser instincts. I can just diss other weblogs and be a self-righteous blogger and I'll have instant material on my blog. But then, the creation of blogging has a higher purpose. That is to test one's truths and dogma in a marketplace of ideas. It is bloody exercise wherein you face the gritty realism of being rejected for your views, beliefs, and/or lack of wit or style. It's a cruel blog jungle out there. Other people will just cut you off if you don't fit their idea of a perfect world. Now you see your link now you don't. The old cliche still holds. You can never please everybody not even in blogosphere. I don't know. Sometimes exercising one's lesser, baser instincts can be good fun, good catharsis, and even good blogging, though I don't think anyone this side of [fill in name of your personal bête noire in blogdom] can pull it off on a regular basis. It is, however, true that this very situation was anticipated thirty-odd years ago. In the words of the late Eric Hilliard Nelson: "You can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." I'm not about to claim that every last one of the three hundred thousand or so words I've tossed up on screen is a keeper, but I'd like to think that they were a reasonable approximation of what I was thinking at the time they were written. To that extent, I suppose, I'm pleased with the results of these ninety-three months. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:48 AM to Blogorrhea
)
Insert pMachine joke here
Something called BlogSex is looking for participants. They're advertising on some sites. I spotted them at BlogShares and at BlogChalking, where they're making the following pitch:
Whether you are practicing abstinence or are experiencing nymphomania BlogSex.com is the perfect activity for you.
I submit that if you're experiencing nymphomania, you're not going to get a hell of a lot of typing done. With a minor amount of Googlage, I was able to turn up the following:
BlogTV announces the BlogSex network. And no it is not a porn site. The coming BlogSex entertainment portal is a hip, sexy Web community offering an online meeting place for both bloggers and non-bloggers alike looking to meet and/or hook up with members of the same and/or opposite sex.
The upcoming BlogSex portal will integrate the intimacy of blogs, racy authors, curious readers, and personal ads into a unique community unlike any other service available today. Members will be able to participate in ménage blogs (group blogs) on diverse topics. From ChristianBlogs.com to QueerBlogs.com the BlogSex network will offer a fresh, risqué online service to the diverse blogosphere. BlogSex.com, a premium BlogTV channel, will launch one week before Valentines Day. Given the flurry of blog weddings in recent months, I'm really not convinced we need this thing; I mean, if you're putting your heart on the screen already, what's the point of doing it again somewhere else? And right before Valentine's Day? Talk about your cruel and unusual punishments. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:39 AM to Blogorrhea
)
Let her dance
One piece you simply must read today: Dean Esmay pays tribute beautifully to the very first woman in his life. Permalink to this item ( posted at 10:11 AM to Blogorrhea
)
Smack dab in the middle
Bruce and I don't agree on too many things, but I definitely buy this observation:
I went all the way out to [Borders] at 21st and the Broken Arrow Exp. (64/51) and felt pretty silly about making the trek just to look at a few magazines and drink a cup of coffee. But you see, it's not like I can do that in BA, because there just isn't much out here. You shouldn't have to drive half an hour to find a suitable place to "hang out". Right?
Right. One of my justifications for moving into the city was to have fewer excuses to pass up an event because it was "too far to drive." And while my after-hours life isn't exactly scintillating these days, it's no longer nonexistent, which surely is worth something. (There are only four Borders stores in the whole state, and it probably would have taken just as long to get to 81st and Yale; the Oklahoma City store is only about 1.4 miles from me, but Full Circle is closer, and it's locally owned, which I tend to view as a plus.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:24 PM to City Scene
)
19 January 2004
The dream remembered
We do love a parade on the Lone Prairie. Last year, over 40,000 turned out to celebrate the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday; only Houston's MLK parade drew a bigger crowd. And while there's a certain irony in the fact that the parade route doesn't actually come within a mile of the street that bears King's name, holding the festivities downtown serves as a reminder that while Dr King was indisputably a black man, the values he preached were values for all of us, race and color nothwithstanding. In the morning, before all the hoopla, there will be a silent march through northeast Oklahoma City to commemorate the marches led by Dr King in the Sixties. It will begin at the Ralph Ellison Library at 23rd and (yes!) MLK Avenue, and end at the Oklahoma Historical building at 22nd and Lincoln, where a bell will be rung to break the silence. I've got to work 42nd and Treadmill waits for no one but at least one Oklahoma blogger will be in the parade: JMBranum of JMBZine will be marching with the local branch of the Green Party. Permalink to this item ( posted at 6:26 AM to Soonerland
)
The tribal council that matters
In 1999, the Cherokee Nation held a constitutional convention, the tribe's first since 1976. That was the easy part. For the next three years, a translator worked to port the resulting document from English into the Cherokee language. Now comes the task of getting the constitution approved by the President of the United States, or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs on his behalf, as required by the previous Cherokee constitution. The tribe has passed an amendment to delete the Federal vetting requirement, but the BIA is balking. Eventually, I suspect, the BIA will come around. And one of the provisions of the constitution allows the Cherokee Nation to send a non-voting delegate to Congress, which should be interesting. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:10 AM to Soonerland
)
A Sac from out of the blue
Kelley's been so incredibly busy lately that it seems almost impossible she could squeeze anything more complicated than going to the bathroom into her schedule. Still, impossible things do happen, and here's an impromptu Cul de Sac for a Monday afternoon, full of fresh bloggy goodness and, yes, twice as absorbent as the cheaper stuff. Permalink to this item ( posted at 2:24 PM to Blogorrhea
)
On the other side of the line
This turned out to be one of those days when I had a lot of writing to do, none of which involved bloggage. If you're bound and determined to see what it was, there's a new Vent, regarding the Iowa caucuses and why they elicit yawns from me, anyway and a review of Befour, the last album by Brian Auger and the Trinity. Mondays are like that, sometimes. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:56 PM to General Disinterest
)
Can you get Febreze by the barrel?
It's called the Cabin Fever Cluster, and it's a four-day weekend of dog shows in Muncie, Indiana. Except this year. The Horizon Convention Center decided that they couldn't risk hosting the shows because of their new carpeted floor, and the clubs involved weren't about to put down plastic sheeting and watch a thousand dogs slip and slide all over the place. I wonder if Greg Hlatky was planning to bring any Borzoi to Muncie. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:24 PM to Dyssynergy
)
20 January 2004
Slowing the revolving door
House Bill 1888, introduced into the Oklahoma legislature by Rep. John Trebilcock (R-Broken Arrow), would impose a two-year waiting period on outgoing lawmakers wishing to become Capitol lobbyists, and would forbid them to accept "anything of value" during those two years. I doubt this will go anywhere, especially with a number of lawmakers facing term limits and having to get real jobs, but Trebilcock, a first-termer who previously taught high school history and government, points out: "A lot of [legislators] go to the Capitol wanting to change things and they think they have to play the game. Or they become cynical. Eventually they forget why they went there." And the occasional reminder never hurts. Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:22 AM to Soonerland
)
Mayberry, B. F. D.
The resurgence of John Edwards, who finished a strong second in Iowa, does not impress McGehee: I think his surprisingly good finish in Iowa is more a reaction to all the other candidates' negativity and Edwards's own more positive tone than to anything of substance about Edwards himself. He will not be the nominee. He will not be on the ticket. I still think Edwards deserves points for being Anyone But Dean, but that's hardly a unique distinction. Permalink to this item ( posted at 9:39 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
The Axis of Sleazy
About a month ago, I described Hartford, Connecticut, where Governor John G. Rowland is somewhere between this close and this close to impeachment, as the Little Easy, quoting political rival Bill Curry's remark that Rowland had turned Connecticut into "Louisiana with foliage." Well, Louisiana may be considered the Big Time in political corruption, but according to this report by Corporate Crime Reporter, America's Sweatbox is only the third most corrupt of the fifty states, trailing Mississippi and North Dakota. (North Dakota?) Criterion for ranking: number of public corruption convictions in the state over a ten-year period (1993-2002) per 100,000 population. Connecticut, on this scale, comes in at a relatively-virtuous thirty-first; Oklahoma ranks twenty-second, and the sanitary state of Nebraska is the cleanest of them all. (The District of Columbia is not rated because, well, it would go clear off the scale.) (Muchas gracias: Brock Sides, Signifying Nothing. Of the two authors of this blog, Mr Sides is the one who doesn't live in Mississippi though Memphis is awfully close.) Permalink to this item ( posted at 1:51 PM to Political Science Fiction
)
Channeling the banshee
The universe of rock and soul contains some truly memorable screams, from James Brown's opening shout in "I Got You (I Feel Good)" to Roger Daltrey's anguished shriek right before "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" in "Won't Get Fooled Again". Howard Dean's uncontrolled emission in Iowa, the sound of a man choking on his second Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster, doesn't quite match this lofty standard, but apparently, unlike these examples, it works with a number of different songs, and, well, there's a lot to be said for versatility. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:38 PM to Almost Yogurt
)
21 January 2004
From the days when TG&Y issued licenses
I'm pretty sure the Dwight David Eisenhower National Defense Interstate Highway System and Cobalt Testing Range, or whatever the hell it's officially called, was never intended for commuters; the very word "Interstate" would seem to make that clear. Still, if a road is there, you tend to use it, and I don't have any particular qualms about using it for the bulk of my newly-tripled commute. On the other hand, I've got to wonder about that character in the purple Dodge with no license plate (he had a cardboard placard in the rear window indicating the number of the plate he presumably had lost) this morning. It was bad enough that he was in the right lane of the Northwest Distressway signaling left; eventually he figured out that he was wearing out his blinker and followed the lane up the approach to the Belle Isle Bridge and I-44, a ramp cutting the tightest possible curve to match the curvature of the bridge itself. Once in place on the freeway, he promptly exited at Western Avenue, having driven barely half a mile on I-44. Why did he bother? Admittedly, surface streets in this area border on the incomprehensible, but we're talking a few blocks at most. This can't be what General Eisenhower had in mind. As counterpoint, the stereo burst into that fake bluegrass ditty about rotting roadkill you know the one and as the song began to fade, the scent of eau de polecat made its presence known. C'mon, stink! Permalink to this item ( posted at 7:38 AM to Soonerland
)
A gutsy position
You should not count Andrea Harris among the undecided:
I've already made up my mind to vote for Bush, and unless he is found pulling the entrails out of live babies to appease his Dark Masters I doubt there will be anything to make me change my mind.
This seems unlikely, unless baby entrails can be classified as a commodity and futures can be bought and sold on the Chicago Board of Trade. On the other hand, this would certainly simplify No Child Left Behind. Permalink to this item ( posted at 8:34 AM to Political Science Fiction
)
|