Comments on: Pending downtime http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-4741 CGHill Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:25:16 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030#comment-4741 What happened to me, basically, is that the full pathname, which I'd been using on the scripts for five years, no longer matched the actual location of things. (They now say "Use the relative location," which is contrary to everything I've been taught, but I'm flatulent in a mature manner.) (Yes, that means I'm an old fart.) What happened to me, basically, is that the full pathname, which I’d been using on the scripts for five years, no longer matched the actual location of things. (They now say “Use the relative location,” which is contrary to everything I’ve been taught, but I’m flatulent in a mature manner.)

(Yes, that means I’m an old fart.)

]]> By: Mister Snitch! http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-4740 Mister Snitch! Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:32:43 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030#comment-4740 Is the site back up yet? Oh. Oh, right... Is the site back up yet? Oh. Oh, right…

]]> By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-4739 CGHill Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:35:19 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030#comment-4739 You're lucky. I can't get here at all. You’re lucky. I can’t get here at all.

]]> By: ms7168 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030/comment-page-1#comment-4738 ms7168 Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:03:13 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2030#comment-4738 Well . . they weren't :( I am not certain exactly when it did come back up but I couldn't get here until around 10am. Well . . they weren’t :( I am not certain exactly when it did come back up but I couldn’t get here until around 10am.

]]>