Comments on: On the cool side of tepid

By: Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:02:27 +0000

I agree with GreenCanary. That was one of the most depressing things I’ve read in awhile. I don’t think I’ll be able to pull the covers back from over my head tomorrow morning.

By: McGehee

McGehee — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:28:30 +0000

She’s run out of worthwhile things to say. I suggest, when it comes to that point, that writers should content themselves to commenting on Charles’ blog.

It’s worked for me so far.

By: McGehee

McGehee — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:27:16 +0000

Just ask the late Junior Samples. (Oh, I guess you can’t, can you?)

Not yet, and hopefully not for another several years.

By: Mister Snitch!

Mister Snitch! — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:38:18 +0000

*sigh* indeed – at this point McArdle just writes for the sake of writing. She’s run out of worthwhile things to say. I suggest, when it comes to that point, that writers should content themselves to commenting on Charles’ blog.

By: CGHill

CGHill — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:49:14 +0000

Overalls have character. Just ask the late Junior Samples. (Oh, I guess you can’t, can you?)

By: McGehee

McGehee — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:31:21 +0000

how attractive are the hottest people who want to go out with you?

Given that in my case they would have to be the type to want to run around with a married man, any definition of attractiveness that included overall character would have to find them lacking.

By: triticale

triticale — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:54:57 +0000

More precisely, financial attractiveness may offset shortcomings in other realms of attractiveness.

By: sya

sya — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:44:01 +0000

[T]he best gauge of how attractive you are: how attractive are the hottest people who want to go out with you? They’re probably only slightly more attractive than you are.

Unless you have a lot of money.

By: GreenCanary

GreenCanary — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:15:53 +0000

This post just depressed me *sigh*