Comments on: The din of iBiquity http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2436 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2436/comment-page-1#comment-6002 CGHill Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:21:11 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2436#comment-6002 There doesn't seem to be a critical mass of HD listeners around here. <a href="http://www.batesline.com/archives/2007/09/way-kqll.html" rel="nofollow">Michael Bates posted something last week</a> on the subject, but that's been about it. There doesn’t seem to be a critical mass of HD listeners around here. Michael Bates posted something last week on the subject, but that’s been about it.

]]> By: Old Grouch http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2436/comment-page-1#comment-6001 Old Grouch Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:53:37 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/2436#comment-6001 Well, nuts. I bookmarked this with the intent of coming back and getting some ideas. Guess the lack of response says something about the lack of uptake of HD, which a lot of industry folks have been harping on for months. In my town there are about 10 HD channels, but most of them are more of the same stuff (albeit with fewer commercials-- and how long will that last, hmmm?). I've been told they're hard to receive-- you need to be really close to the transmitter, or have a really good antenna. Well, nuts. I bookmarked this with the intent of coming back and getting some ideas. Guess the lack of response says something about the lack of uptake of HD, which a lot of industry folks have been harping on for months.

In my town there are about 10 HD channels, but most of them are more of the same stuff (albeit with fewer commercials– and how long will that last, hmmm?). I’ve been told they’re hard to receive– you need to be really close to the transmitter, or have a really good antenna.

]]>