Kamalamadingdong

JD Rucker said this last fall:

But if not Clooney, then who? How about Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA)?

Assuming Clooney doesn’t run, the more likely and mainstream choice of Senator Kamala Harris is poised to be the nominee. She’ll win California if she’s even a blip on the radar. Her opponents would have to eliminate her from contention altogether for her to lose this state where she is extremely popular.

Unfortunately for other hopefuls, the only way to eliminate her from contention will likely be through scandal because if California‚Äôs current plan passes, she’ll only have to go through Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada. The state is pushing to move their primary to early March, making it the kingmaker it has always wanted to be.

As Politico points out, her opponents would be hard-pressed to mount the fundraising efforts necessary to blitz the most populous state in the nation with enough juice to derail her. That’s not going to happen unless Mark Cuban or some other self-funded billionaire enters the race. Harris will be the Democratic nominee and the DNC will wholeheartedly embrace her as the Trump-slayer.

And for those benighted jokers who make their selection on the basis of eye candy, she’s a cinch:

Kamala Harris has something to say

Kamala Harris has something to say

For those more obsessive than I:

And hey, if George Clooney does win, the First Lady will suddenly be vaulted into Jackie Kennedy territory. We’ve looked at her once.

Okay, more than once.





8 comments »

  1. ETat »

    20 September 2017 · 6:12 am

    hmm…so you think there comes the era of muslim mata haris? they should take as a warning huma abedin’s story (btw, she is divorcing her husband. hillary didn’t win, and huma sees no point in holding on onto maverick horse)

  2. McG »

    20 September 2017 · 7:40 am

    The state is pushing to move their primary to early March, making it the kingmaker it has always wanted to be.

    It’s been tried. Admittedly, the California winners did become the nominees, and anyone who remembers that November and December, who wants to relive it 20 years later, should be summarily and involuntarily committed to a psychiatric detention facility.

  3. Holly H »

    20 September 2017 · 10:16 am

    ETat, I am confused. Why the “Muslim” reference, and why the “Mata Hari” reference? 1. She is Baptist, according to my cursory research. 2. So…because she is a non-white female, she must be a “Mata Hari”?

    hmmmmmmmm………..

  4. CGHill »

    20 September 2017 · 1:47 pm

    Lots of South Asians show up in these pages, and as all our stereotypes tell us, all of Them look alike.

    And actually, Senator Harris’ mom is Tamil, from the Gopalan family.

  5. ETat »

    21 September 2017 · 7:01 am

    “Etat, I am confused” – yes, dear, we know.
    Harris was not the only subject of this post – it is also the notorious Mrs Clooney – look her up. Although, I’m sure, you’ll see nothing wrong in muslim activist, championing liberal fascism and vulgar socialism for stupid pawns while cynically making money out of it. Propelling herself by centuries-old method in the circles where she can a) influence, b)enrich herself most efficiently.
    Harris is the same, basically – look at objects of her amorous affairs (Wiki). Besides, she is about as “Christian” as Obama. And just as him she is a false “minority”. And just like him she is an empty suit. Just like him, she is a fake lawyer. And just like him she is a product of a brief marriage of non-black mother with black father, missing in action of raising his progeny. And just like him her family have been upper middle class. Most importantly like him she prostitutes her [mixed] race as means of enriching herself by demagogy and manipulation, and is totally, utterly disgusting.
    I can go on.

  6. Holly H »

    21 September 2017 · 12:18 pm

    “Most importantly like him she prostitutes her [mixed] race as means of enriching herself by demagogy and manipulation, and is totally, utterly disgusting.
    I can go on.”

    Please don’t.

  7. ETat »

    21 September 2017 · 9:35 pm

    Glad to see the confusion lifted. You;re welcome, happy to assist any time.

  8. Rule 5 Sunday: A Different Demi : The Other McCain »

    24 September 2017 · 8:37 pm

    […] Babe is Rose La Rose, and Sex in Advertising is covered by Sela Ward. At Dustbury, it’s Kamala Harris and Heidi El Tabakh […]

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a comment