Comments on: Chafing the elephant http://www.dustbury.com/archives/261 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dan http://www.dustbury.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-310 Dan Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:41:41 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/261#comment-310 More power to them, I say. I don't know why the dinomedia insists on calling him a "moderate" Republican. He's clearly a liberal Republican. There's nothing wrong with being a liberal Republican, at least, not in Rhode Island. More power to them, I say. I don’t know why the dinomedia insists on calling him a “moderate” Republican. He’s clearly a liberal Republican. There’s nothing wrong with being a liberal Republican, at least, not in Rhode Island.

]]> By: McGehee http://www.dustbury.com/archives/261/comment-page-1#comment-309 McGehee Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:25:48 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/261#comment-309 <i>"If we're going to have a Democrat in this seat, we might as well have a Democrat who will caucus with us."</i> Pretty much. Other than the question of who holds a majority of seats, I didn't really see a downside to a Democrat representing a state full of Democrats. But apparently that business about a majority of seats matters to those political types. “If we’re going to have a Democrat in this seat, we might as well have a Democrat who will caucus with us.”

Pretty much. Other than the question of who holds a majority of seats, I didn’t really see a downside to a Democrat representing a state full of Democrats.

But apparently that business about a majority of seats matters to those political types.

]]>