<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go with the name you know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/comment-page-1#comment-7510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072#comment-7510</guid>
		<description>Our corporate deity recently deemed Office 2007 mandatory.  The 15 minute install for me took 45 minutes ... while a fellow cubicle dweller&#039;s install resulted in a new laptop.

My own response is &quot;underwhelmed&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our corporate deity recently deemed Office 2007 mandatory.  The 15 minute install for me took 45 minutes &#8230; while a fellow cubicle dweller&#8217;s install resulted in a new laptop.</p>
<p>My own response is &#8220;underwhelmed&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/comment-page-1#comment-7509</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072#comment-7509</guid>
		<description>One thing I really like about OO is that you can export docs to pdf format. Can&#039;t do that with Word (unless the newest version has added the feature). I&#039;m using MS Office now because it came with my computer. Otherwise, I&#039;d still use OO.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I really like about OO is that you can export docs to pdf format. Can&#8217;t do that with Word (unless the newest version has added the feature). I&#8217;m using MS Office now because it came with my computer. Otherwise, I&#8217;d still use OO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/comment-page-1#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>The last time I produced something to be printed and read by others, I used the oxymoronically named Microsoft Works -- it came with the OS.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time I produced something to be printed and read by others, I used the oxymoronically named Microsoft Works &#8212; it came with the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Owen Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/comment-page-1#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator>John Owen Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072#comment-7507</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used StarOffice since 5.0 and then OpenOffice 0.9 when still in beta to its present versions, in both Win98 through Vista and Linux RedHat 7.2 &amp; 9, Sun Office Java Desktop System, and various shades of Ubuntu Linux (so, about 8 years of experience with them). I had Word 6.0 on an old 486 laptop. I liked Word 6.0; it fit like an old shoe.

StarOffice was still a bit Teutonic for me when it was acquired by Sun (a few of the help sections were still in German or in a stiled English translation), but I used it anyway and got used to it. It was sure better than MSWorks. The old StarOffice 5.0-5.2 had calendaring and email integrated, but it was stripped out in later iterations.

I have the same beef with Avery labels; it just isn&#039;t right (I haven&#039;t tried it in OO2.3.1 yet).

I like OO &#039;cause it is free. I, too, write and speak in my calling, and OO gets me where I need to go.

I have used Google docs, though, for most of my sermon writing since it was still Writely. Anything fancier, I go to OO. There is some move towards an online version of OO.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used StarOffice since 5.0 and then OpenOffice 0.9 when still in beta to its present versions, in both Win98 through Vista and Linux RedHat 7.2 &#038; 9, Sun Office Java Desktop System, and various shades of Ubuntu Linux (so, about 8 years of experience with them). I had Word 6.0 on an old 486 laptop. I liked Word 6.0; it fit like an old shoe.</p>
<p>StarOffice was still a bit Teutonic for me when it was acquired by Sun (a few of the help sections were still in German or in a stiled English translation), but I used it anyway and got used to it. It was sure better than MSWorks. The old StarOffice 5.0-5.2 had calendaring and email integrated, but it was stripped out in later iterations.</p>
<p>I have the same beef with Avery labels; it just isn&#8217;t right (I haven&#8217;t tried it in OO2.3.1 yet).</p>
<p>I like OO &#8217;cause it is free. I, too, write and speak in my calling, and OO gets me where I need to go.</p>
<p>I have used Google docs, though, for most of my sermon writing since it was still Writely. Anything fancier, I go to OO. There is some move towards an online version of OO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/comment-page-1#comment-7506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072#comment-7506</guid>
		<description>Ol&#039; Steve has made me feel pretty guilty about some of the software I&#039;ve used. There is nothing illegal or immoral (software, anyways) on this laptop, but I sure couldn&#039;t say that in the past.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ol&#8217; Steve has made me feel pretty guilty about some of the software I&#8217;ve used. There is nothing illegal or immoral (software, anyways) on this laptop, but I sure couldn&#8217;t say that in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan B</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072/comment-page-1#comment-7505</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3072#comment-7505</guid>
		<description>The only problem I&#039;ve had with OpenOffice is that it didn&#039;t make Avery labels just right.  Fortunately the rest of the office has Turd 2000 so I just transfer the addresses and print from there.  They may have fixed the problem, since it was 2.1 that had the problem and they&#039;re at 2.3.1 now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem I&#8217;ve had with OpenOffice is that it didn&#8217;t make Avery labels just right.  Fortunately the rest of the office has Turd 2000 so I just transfer the addresses and print from there.  They may have fixed the problem, since it was 2.1 that had the problem and they&#8217;re at 2.3.1 now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

