<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Policy matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis W. Porretto</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478/comment-page-1#comment-8513</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis W. Porretto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478#comment-8513</guid>
		<description>Well, Charles, there are a couple of differences between auto and health coverage. First, the roads are state property. (Forget that &quot;public property&quot; jazz; there never has been such a thing and there never will be. He who holds the rights over the transfer, use, and destruction of a thing thereby owns that thing.) An owner has the right to set the terms under which others may enter his domain.

The other big, salient one is that drivers on a shared road have placed one another at mutual risk. Each one is a major source of harm and hazard to the others. Since driving is a discretionary act -- from what I recall, breathing is not -- to mandate that drivers maintain the ability to compensate those they might injure is more reasonable than to mandate that an individual be able to pay for medical services for himself.

Of course, the notion that that ability must be provided by a third-party insurer requires more justification than this, and I&#039;m not sure such a justification exists. Time was, if you could escrow a certain amount of money as self-insurance -- I believe the amount was $100,000 -- you were exempt from the requirement to carry liability insurance in New York State. But that exemption was quietly repealed by our legislature a couple of decades ago. Probably at the behest of the auto insurance companies.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Charles, there are a couple of differences between auto and health coverage. First, the roads are state property. (Forget that &#8220;public property&#8221; jazz; there never has been such a thing and there never will be. He who holds the rights over the transfer, use, and destruction of a thing thereby owns that thing.) An owner has the right to set the terms under which others may enter his domain.</p>
<p>The other big, salient one is that drivers on a shared road have placed one another at mutual risk. Each one is a major source of harm and hazard to the others. Since driving is a discretionary act &#8212; from what I recall, breathing is not &#8212; to mandate that drivers maintain the ability to compensate those they might injure is more reasonable than to mandate that an individual be able to pay for medical services for himself.</p>
<p>Of course, the notion that that ability must be provided by a third-party insurer requires more justification than this, and I&#8217;m not sure such a justification exists. Time was, if you could escrow a certain amount of money as self-insurance &#8212; I believe the amount was $100,000 &#8212; you were exempt from the requirement to carry liability insurance in New York State. But that exemption was quietly repealed by our legislature a couple of decades ago. Probably at the behest of the auto insurance companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPD in OKC</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478/comment-page-1#comment-8512</link>
		<dc:creator>BPD in OKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478#comment-8512</guid>
		<description>I think the government should mandate that the body shop would have to fix your car if you don&#039;t have insurance. Maybe the government would also put caps on how much the mechanics could charge you. Now that would be nice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the government should mandate that the body shop would have to fix your car if you don&#8217;t have insurance. Maybe the government would also put caps on how much the mechanics could charge you. Now that would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478/comment-page-1#comment-8511</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478#comment-8511</guid>
		<description>Of course, if the government mandated that the body shop &lt;i&gt;had&lt;/i&gt; to fix your car &#151; but let&#039;s not give anyone any ideas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, if the government mandated that the body shop <i>had</i> to fix your car &#8212; but let&#8217;s not give anyone any ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aero</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478/comment-page-1#comment-8510</link>
		<dc:creator>Aero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478#comment-8510</guid>
		<description>Did you happen to see the news report a few weeks ago about the random stops in MWC? Out of 125 motorists stopped, 106 had no auto insurance. Bless my Uninsured Motorist coverage!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you happen to see the news report a few weeks ago about the random stops in MWC? Out of 125 motorists stopped, 106 had no auto insurance. Bless my Uninsured Motorist coverage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Mecoy</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478/comment-page-1#comment-8509</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Mecoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3478#comment-8509</guid>
		<description>An interesting analogy. One difference is that if you show up at a body shop with no insurance, no one feels obligated to fix your car.

Thanks for reading.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting analogy. One difference is that if you show up at a body shop with no insurance, no one feels obligated to fix your car.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

