<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timing is everything (v2.42)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8769</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8769</guid>
		<description>Or, for that matter, you could get into the 40-minute range with Jethro Tull&#039;s &quot;Thick as a Brick&quot; or Mike Oldfield&#039;s &quot;Tubular Bells,&quot; both of which were cruelly truncated for radio play: &quot;Tubular Bells,&quot; in its guise as a theme to &lt;i&gt;The Exorcist,&lt;/i&gt; is the longer of the two, at a mere 3:18.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, for that matter, you could get into the 40-minute range with Jethro Tull&#8217;s &#8220;Thick as a Brick&#8221; or Mike Oldfield&#8217;s &#8220;Tubular Bells,&#8221; both of which were cruelly truncated for radio play: &#8220;Tubular Bells,&#8221; in its guise as a theme to <i>The Exorcist,</i> is the longer of the two, at a mere 3:18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8768</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8768</guid>
		<description>_In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida_ was 17:38, Rare Earth had a live version of _Get Ready_ that was 23:38, and  Frampton&#039;s live version of _Do You Feel Like We Do_ was 14:19.  These I know off the top of my head, but with a little skull sweat I could come up with others.

These were the versions I had on vinyl and listened to them extensively, these versions are the ones I prefer;  any of the shorter versions sound...abbreviated.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida_ was 17:38, Rare Earth had a live version of _Get Ready_ that was 23:38, and  Frampton&#8217;s live version of _Do You Feel Like We Do_ was 14:19.  These I know off the top of my head, but with a little skull sweat I could come up with others.</p>
<p>These were the versions I had on vinyl and listened to them extensively, these versions are the ones I prefer;  any of the shorter versions sound&#8230;abbreviated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8767</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8767</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hotel California&lt;/i&gt; is 6:54 on the Hell Freezes Over album.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hotel California</i> is 6:54 on the Hell Freezes Over album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8766</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8766</guid>
		<description>I prefer &quot;songs&quot; that range from 20 to 50 minutes although if it&#039;s really outstanding even 90 minutes is not a bit too long.

Seriously though... talking about pop and rock and roll songs, I like longer songs if they&#039;re good. &lt;i&gt;American Pie&lt;/i&gt;... umm.... how long is &lt;i&gt;Hotel California&lt;/i&gt;? I forget; it seems like that one is rather long but not too long. And I&#039;m surprised that, with six comments already, no one has mentioned the greatest long song ever: &lt;i&gt;Alice&#039;s Restaurant&lt;/i&gt; 18:20
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer &#8220;songs&#8221; that range from 20 to 50 minutes although if it&#8217;s really outstanding even 90 minutes is not a bit too long.</p>
<p>Seriously though&#8230; talking about pop and rock and roll songs, I like longer songs if they&#8217;re good. <i>American Pie</i>&#8230; umm&#8230;. how long is <i>Hotel California</i>? I forget; it seems like that one is rather long but not too long. And I&#8217;m surprised that, with six comments already, no one has mentioned the greatest long song ever: <i>Alice&#8217;s Restaurant</i> 18:20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8765</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8765</guid>
		<description>Well this is a bunny trail, but sort of related. I thought I was going to grow old and die, listening to Mariah Carey sing on American Idol this week. She whined on, and on, on, on, and ON. I was hoping that Ryan would walk on stage and cut her off. It was awful and it was boring.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this is a bunny trail, but sort of related. I thought I was going to grow old and die, listening to Mariah Carey sing on American Idol this week. She whined on, and on, on, on, and ON. I was hoping that Ryan would walk on stage and cut her off. It was awful and it was boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sya</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8764</link>
		<dc:creator>sya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8764</guid>
		<description>Maybe this makes me too anal, but I&#039;d like to see an actual distribution for song durations for the top 100 songs from say, oh, the past 50 years.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this makes me too anal, but I&#8217;d like to see an actual distribution for song durations for the top 100 songs from say, oh, the past 50 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8763</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8763</guid>
		<description>One of the songs that shows up as 2:42 in my iTunes is Bob Wills&#039; &quot;Weary of the Same Ol&#039; Stuff.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the songs that shows up as 2:42 in my iTunes is Bob Wills&#8217; &#8220;Weary of the Same Ol&#8217; Stuff.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8762</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8762</guid>
		<description>The single version ran a modest 2:52; my own reedit was a reticent 2:00.

A classic-rock station around here once spewed forth an edit running about eight and a half minutes.  Split the difference, as it were.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single version ran a modest 2:52; my own reedit was a reticent 2:00.</p>
<p>A classic-rock station around here once spewed forth an edit running about eight and a half minutes.  Split the difference, as it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8761</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8761</guid>
		<description>And yet the version of In-a-Gadda-da-Vida on my .mp3 player, at 3:03, strikes me as &lt;i&gt;too short.&lt;/i&gt;

The fact I always heard the long version from my brother&#039;s Iron Butterfly LP may have something to do with my opinion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet the version of In-a-Gadda-da-Vida on my .mp3 player, at 3:03, strikes me as <i>too short.</i></p>
<p>The fact I always heard the long version from my brother&#8217;s Iron Butterfly LP may have something to do with my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546/comment-page-1#comment-8760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/archives/3546#comment-8760</guid>
		<description>Unlike &quot;Inna Gadda Davida,&quot; which was &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; too long.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike &#8220;Inna Gadda Davida,&#8221; which was <i>way</i> too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

