Comments on: On the Sarah’s Shoes beat http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5569 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:27:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kick the Anthill » Sarah Style; BONUS Blogger Makeovers! http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5569/comment-page-1#comment-10750 Kick the Anthill » Sarah Style; BONUS Blogger Makeovers! Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:20:34 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5569#comment-10750 [...] love her taste in shoes.  Perfect for kicking liberal anthills [...] [...] love her taste in shoes.  Perfect for kicking liberal anthills [...]

]]> By: Brian J. http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5569/comment-page-1#comment-10726 Brian J. Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:16:18 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5569#comment-10726 Correction: It <i>wasn't</i> an adjective. They build the language very streetly, not academically. Woo! I called dibs on the adverb. Correction: It wasn’t an adjective.

They build the language very streetly, not academically.

Woo! I called dibs on the adverb.

]]> By: McGehee http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5569/comment-page-1#comment-10725 McGehee Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:47:31 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5569#comment-10725 I'm not sure wearing a campaign button with the word "monkey" on it is permissible in 2008. In fairness, I'm pretty sure the words "harpy" and (rhymes with snitch) are also proscribed. I’m not sure wearing a campaign button with the word “monkey” on it is permissible in 2008.

In fairness, I’m pretty sure the words “harpy” and (rhymes with snitch) are also proscribed.

]]>