http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568/comment-page-1#comment-1193 CGHill Sat, 04 Nov 2006 14:21:36 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568#comment-1193 At the time, I said it was "better than anything Zimmerman ever did with that tune," and I'm sticking to that story. At the time, I said it was “better than anything Zimmerman ever did with that tune,” and I’m sticking to that story.

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568/comment-page-1#comment-1192 Mister Snitch! Sat, 04 Nov 2006 02:24:54 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568#comment-1192 You think he'd object to <a href="http://mistersnitch.blogspot.com/2005/09/here-comes-story-of-hurricane.html" rel="nofollow"><b>this</b></a>? You think he’d object to this?

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568/comment-page-1#comment-1191 CGHill Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:17:18 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568#comment-1191 At least I resisted the temptation of the working title of this post, which was "Look out, kid, it's <i>someone</i> you did." At least I resisted the temptation of the working title of this post, which was “Look out, kid, it’s someone you did.”

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568/comment-page-1#comment-1190 McGehee Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:26:06 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/568#comment-1190 Now, if Dawn's song had been nothing but palindromes (about chastity, of course) that would have been -- what, a four-fer? Now, if Dawn’s song had been nothing but palindromes (about chastity, of course) that would have been — what, a four-fer?

]]>