<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11712</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11712</guid>
		<description>And now we hear that &lt;a href=&quot;http://philmon.blogspot.com/2008/10/joe-plumber.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe the Plumber really &lt;i&gt;isn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; a plumber&lt;/a&gt; by someone&#039;s estimation. Not that he should take up interior design or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now we hear that <a href="http://philmon.blogspot.com/2008/10/joe-plumber.html" rel="nofollow">Joe the Plumber really <i>isn&#8217;t</i> a plumber</a> by someone&#8217;s estimation. Not that he should take up interior design or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11390</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11390</guid>
		<description>Fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11389</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11389</guid>
		<description>Well, I am sorry if I appeared to impugn you or your profession, or if I left anyone with the impression that said profession was unworthy.  It was never my intent to deliver an insult disguised as a post.

But as I said way up there near the top of the thread, I don&#039;t have any issues with certification per se; I simply don&#039;t see why it&#039;s necessary to back it up with the power of the state.  Maybe J. Random Consumer lacks the expertise to do comparison shopping, but that, to me, is an indication that he needs to smarten up before he writes large checks, not a mandate to the legislature to protect him from his presumed dimness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am sorry if I appeared to impugn you or your profession, or if I left anyone with the impression that said profession was unworthy.  It was never my intent to deliver an insult disguised as a post.</p>
<p>But as I said way up there near the top of the thread, I don&#8217;t have any issues with certification per se; I simply don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s necessary to back it up with the power of the state.  Maybe J. Random Consumer lacks the expertise to do comparison shopping, but that, to me, is an indication that he needs to smarten up before he writes large checks, not a mandate to the legislature to protect him from his presumed dimness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11386</guid>
		<description>It should be one of those occasions, Chaz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be one of those occasions, Chaz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11379</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11379</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t intended as such.  (On those exceedingly-rare occasions when I am apologetic, it&#039;s usually excruciatingly obvious.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t intended as such.  (On those exceedingly-rare occasions when I am apologetic, it&#8217;s usually excruciatingly obvious.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11377</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’d misremembered you as an architect&lt;/i&gt;
is that supposed to be an excuse for apology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’d misremembered you as an architect</i><br />
is that supposed to be an excuse for apology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11363</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11363</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;d misremembered you as an architect, but the correction is welcomed.

There are times when I&#039;ve watched that HGTV stuff and thought &quot;I can do better than that,&quot; but &quot;better than that&quot; does not necessarily equal &quot;good,&quot; nor is it necessarily within spitting distance of &quot;original.&quot;  (Similarly, I&#039;ve written five songs, but three of them turned out to be &quot;Walk &#151; Don&#039;t Run.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;d misremembered you as an architect, but the correction is welcomed.</p>
<p>There are times when I&#8217;ve watched that HGTV stuff and thought &#8220;I can do better than that,&#8221; but &#8220;better than that&#8221; does not necessarily equal &#8220;good,&#8221; nor is it necessarily within spitting distance of &#8220;original.&#8221;  (Similarly, I&#8217;ve written five songs, but three of them turned out to be &#8220;Walk &#8212; Don&#8217;t Run.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11322</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11322</guid>
		<description>*U, re: TV &quot;design&quot; shows: a handy phrase to remember is &quot;I&#039;m not a doctor, I just play one on TV&quot;. The problem is, the participants honestly think they ARE designers. Just for fun, try to find out their credentials: I don&#039;t recall, when I was watching, even one having so much as completed 4 years of formal education in FIDER-affiliated college.
 That, actually, confirms what I said above about necessity of certification - and every secretary&#039;s ability to judge.

It might be presumptuous of me, but I believe Chaz is aware of me being an ID - after a few years of reading each other&#039;s blogs and comments someplace else. Not sure about the rest on the thread - but knowing or not knowing is not the point.
It&#039;s the general attitude towards profession - and I met it countless times. For some reason it is not considered serious one. Will anybody say architect is not a serious profession? But we do 70% of what architects do (in my current office I do 95%), and then some - things they don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*U, re: TV &#8220;design&#8221; shows: a handy phrase to remember is &#8220;I&#8217;m not a doctor, I just play one on TV&#8221;. The problem is, the participants honestly think they ARE designers. Just for fun, try to find out their credentials: I don&#8217;t recall, when I was watching, even one having so much as completed 4 years of formal education in FIDER-affiliated college.<br />
 That, actually, confirms what I said above about necessity of certification &#8211; and every secretary&#8217;s ability to judge.</p>
<p>It might be presumptuous of me, but I believe Chaz is aware of me being an ID &#8211; after a few years of reading each other&#8217;s blogs and comments someplace else. Not sure about the rest on the thread &#8211; but knowing or not knowing is not the point.<br />
It&#8217;s the general attitude towards profession &#8211; and I met it countless times. For some reason it is not considered serious one. Will anybody say architect is not a serious profession? But we do 70% of what architects do (in my current office I do 95%), and then some &#8211; things they don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>(Forgot something)

I have several female relatives that watch EVERY design (clothing, interior, et.al.) reality show that is aired.  Much of what is on the show(s) just turns my stomach -including- the clothing of the judges of the designs.  I&#039;ve already stated that my sense of style is non-existant and I swear that even I could do better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Forgot something)</p>
<p>I have several female relatives that watch EVERY design (clothing, interior, et.al.) reality show that is aired.  Much of what is on the show(s) just turns my stomach -including- the clothing of the judges of the designs.  I&#8217;ve already stated that my sense of style is non-existant and I swear that even I could do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11315</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11315</guid>
		<description>Tatyana:  I still think you are wrapped just a bit too tight.  I thought the feng shui comment was him being a smartass (I was right) and was not in any way smug or condescending.  You took extreme umbrage to a generaly purpose catty remark as if were pointed directly at you.  You hadn&#039;t even posted a comment yet, there was no way for anyone to know that it was in any way pertinent or applicable to you.

As far as the &quot;design&quot; field is concerned, I consider it pretentious, primarily because MY sense of style is virtually non-existant and can&#039;t comprehend what all the fuss is about.  Never mind that I can&#039;t afford the service even if I had a desire to &quot;keep up with the Joneses (or Vanderbilts, etc.)&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tatyana:  I still think you are wrapped just a bit too tight.  I thought the feng shui comment was him being a smartass (I was right) and was not in any way smug or condescending.  You took extreme umbrage to a generaly purpose catty remark as if were pointed directly at you.  You hadn&#8217;t even posted a comment yet, there was no way for anyone to know that it was in any way pertinent or applicable to you.</p>
<p>As far as the &#8220;design&#8221; field is concerned, I consider it pretentious, primarily because MY sense of style is virtually non-existant and can&#8217;t comprehend what all the fuss is about.  Never mind that I can&#8217;t afford the service even if I had a desire to &#8220;keep up with the Joneses (or Vanderbilts, etc.)&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11302</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11302</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;*unimpressed - read his first “feng shui” comment.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which anyone else here knew was a toss-away joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>*unimpressed &#8211; read his first “feng shui” comment.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Which anyone else here knew was a toss-away joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11289</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;rent-seeking&quot; is defined at great, even humongous, length &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.friesian.com/rent.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;rent-seeking&#8221; is defined at great, even humongous, length <a href="http://www.friesian.com/rent.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>*unimpressed - read his first &quot;feng shui&quot; comment.

Besides, any interviews with service provider (that category includes, for the purposes of this thread, member of any trade who sells his technical knowledge for money: structural engineer or an operating nurse) or his customers always come AFTER making sure this professional completed certain level of education and work experience. 
Hell, I won&#039;t even trust a hairdresser if all she has to offer as qualification is good opinion of 10 of her clients!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*unimpressed &#8211; read his first &#8220;feng shui&#8221; comment.</p>
<p>Besides, any interviews with service provider (that category includes, for the purposes of this thread, member of any trade who sells his technical knowledge for money: structural engineer or an operating nurse) or his customers always come AFTER making sure this professional completed certain level of education and work experience.<br />
Hell, I won&#8217;t even trust a hairdresser if all she has to offer as qualification is good opinion of 10 of her clients!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11282</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11282</guid>
		<description>Tatyana, I read McGehee&#039;s post three times and I think you over-reacted more than a little.  He was putting down state licensing as much as you were, maybe more.  He said &quot;get a much better idea of how competent said “doctor” is than a state medical license would tell him&quot;.  I read that as meaning the interviews would give him better information than the state accreditation--which appears as if he thinks it worthless--as do you.  My take is that he was AGREEING with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tatyana, I read McGehee&#8217;s post three times and I think you over-reacted more than a little.  He was putting down state licensing as much as you were, maybe more.  He said &#8220;get a much better idea of how competent said “doctor” is than a state medical license would tell him&#8221;.  I read that as meaning the interviews would give him better information than the state accreditation&#8211;which appears as if he thinks it worthless&#8211;as do you.  My take is that he was AGREEING with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11278</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>Talking to a bunch of patients? What a great method of employing a professional. The best rec, probably, would come from the deceased - they have nothing to say, so definitely nothing negative!

Tell me McG, are you in a profession of any kind? Any diplomas, certificates, licences to your name? Would you get a better job without them? Would you offer in lieu of professional qualifications to your potential employer/customer a list of &quot;satisfied clinets&quot;? 

Besides, it looks like for all your smug condescension to my profession you don&#039;t know how to read: you still stick &quot;state&quot; into your comment, ignoring what I said about governmental involvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking to a bunch of patients? What a great method of employing a professional. The best rec, probably, would come from the deceased &#8211; they have nothing to say, so definitely nothing negative!</p>
<p>Tell me McG, are you in a profession of any kind? Any diplomas, certificates, licences to your name? Would you get a better job without them? Would you offer in lieu of professional qualifications to your potential employer/customer a list of &#8220;satisfied clinets&#8221;? </p>
<p>Besides, it looks like for all your smug condescension to my profession you don&#8217;t know how to read: you still stick &#8220;state&#8221; into your comment, ignoring what I said about governmental involvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11277</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>Knowing Brian, he&#039;d demand a list of that &quot;doctor&#039;s&quot; patients, and would talk to a bunch of them.

And he&#039;d probably get a much better idea of how competent said &quot;doctor&quot; is than a state medical license would tell him. After all, what do you call the guy who graduated last in his class at med school?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing Brian, he&#8217;d demand a list of that &#8220;doctor&#8217;s&#8221; patients, and would talk to a bunch of them.</p>
<p>And he&#8217;d probably get a much better idea of how competent said &#8220;doctor&#8221; is than a state medical license would tell him. After all, what do you call the guy who graduated last in his class at med school?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11273</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11273</guid>
		<description>Brian, I guess you&#039;ll pay anybody if you need a doctor and he says (s)he&#039;s one.
Please explain what you meant by &quot;rent-seeking&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I guess you&#8217;ll pay anybody if you need a doctor and he says (s)he&#8217;s one.<br />
Please explain what you meant by &#8220;rent-seeking&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11272</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11272</guid>
		<description>I should guess having someone who&#039;ll pay you to do it would qualify you for the position.

But rent-seeking always trumps principle.  My uncle, a &quot;conservative&quot; Republican who sells real estate, backed state law changes to make it harder/impossible for non-Realtors to sell property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should guess having someone who&#8217;ll pay you to do it would qualify you for the position.</p>
<p>But rent-seeking always trumps principle.  My uncle, a &#8220;conservative&#8221; Republican who sells real estate, backed state law changes to make it harder/impossible for non-Realtors to sell property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11266</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11266</guid>
		<description>Certainly, I&#039;m against state/federal governments getting involved with any professional certification. But the idea of certification is a good and necessary idea. 

&quot;Having style&quot; does not qualify an individual to be an interior designer.
Having 30 and 40 years experience with writing a column in town paper about &quot;style&quot; does not qualify. Having 50 years experience stroking the residential clients&#039; lapdogs in Long Island beach houses and holding their hands while walking fabric showrooms does not qualify. Hell, even being a licensed, AIA-ed architect does not qualify. They no zilch when it comes to my training.What qualifies? Here&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncidq.org/who/definition.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;definition of Interior Designer&lt;/a&gt;. And I do more than that.

I&#039;ve seen &quot;designers&quot; like the ones mentioned in the article you post about. They have no idea how to use CAD. They know nothing of lighting source&#039;s chemical composition. They &quot;trust&quot; the millworker when it comes to drawing a section of a cabinet. They charge a comission on goods they recommend. They don&#039;t understand the difference between California and New Jersey Fire codes. They can&#039;t carry intelligent conversation with their plumbing engineer. Security guys can sell then a Brooklyn bridge - and then they would talk the client in buying one: they have no understanding how magnetic lock works. 

Of course they&#039;re opposed to licensing. I bet they are not certified by any other agency, either. All they have is years of BSting their clients. 

No wonder one sees disparaging attitude in public for the profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly, I&#8217;m against state/federal governments getting involved with any professional certification. But the idea of certification is a good and necessary idea. </p>
<p>&#8220;Having style&#8221; does not qualify an individual to be an interior designer.<br />
Having 30 and 40 years experience with writing a column in town paper about &#8220;style&#8221; does not qualify. Having 50 years experience stroking the residential clients&#8217; lapdogs in Long Island beach houses and holding their hands while walking fabric showrooms does not qualify. Hell, even being a licensed, AIA-ed architect does not qualify. They no zilch when it comes to my training.What qualifies? Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.ncidq.org/who/definition.htm" rel="nofollow">definition of Interior Designer</a>. And I do more than that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen &#8220;designers&#8221; like the ones mentioned in the article you post about. They have no idea how to use CAD. They know nothing of lighting source&#8217;s chemical composition. They &#8220;trust&#8221; the millworker when it comes to drawing a section of a cabinet. They charge a comission on goods they recommend. They don&#8217;t understand the difference between California and New Jersey Fire codes. They can&#8217;t carry intelligent conversation with their plumbing engineer. Security guys can sell then a Brooklyn bridge &#8211; and then they would talk the client in buying one: they have no understanding how magnetic lock works. </p>
<p>Of course they&#8217;re opposed to licensing. I bet they are not certified by any other agency, either. All they have is years of BSting their clients. </p>
<p>No wonder one sees disparaging attitude in public for the profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11261</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11261</guid>
		<description>There are always good reasons to hate the public.

On the other hand, while I certainly don&#039;t have an issue with certification, I question the necessity of having it backed up by state boards who generally aren&#039;t answerable to anybody.  Don&#039;t your credentials speak for themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are always good reasons to hate the public.</p>
<p>On the other hand, while I certainly don&#8217;t have an issue with certification, I question the necessity of having it backed up by state boards who generally aren&#8217;t answerable to anybody.  Don&#8217;t your credentials speak for themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatyana</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11256</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatyana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11256</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Practicing feng shui without a license&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s exactly the sort of things that separates an interior designer  - a real one - from the wannabes who look for easy money.

Why not start denying licensing to doctors, lawyers, architects and engineers? Why pick on interior designers? Afraid on taking one someone your own weight? 

God only knows how many illiterate morons I&#039;ve met in my 15 years on the job who told me &quot;My godfather and all members of my Reading Club told me I have such a good taste - I should have been interior designer!&quot; Every damn (and dumb) secretary feels fit to be a critic.

FYI: there is no nationally recognized licensing practice exist at the moment. We are encouraged, though, to participate in voluntary certification tests, 2 days in a row 4hrs each, that is provided by NCIDQ. And about time, I say. 

In my own experience during the exam (I&#039;m a Certified Commercial Designer, if that&#039;s not clear yet), only the people who call themselves &quot;decorators&quot; or &quot;feng shui&quot; practitioners, or &quot;design educators&quot;, or &quot;decorating consultants&quot; were having difficulties with passing. And for some reason they tend to have 40 years experience, by the look of them.


Thanks a lot, Chaz. You reminded me why I sometimes hate the public I swore to serve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Practicing feng shui without a license</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly the sort of things that separates an interior designer  &#8211; a real one &#8211; from the wannabes who look for easy money.</p>
<p>Why not start denying licensing to doctors, lawyers, architects and engineers? Why pick on interior designers? Afraid on taking one someone your own weight? </p>
<p>God only knows how many illiterate morons I&#8217;ve met in my 15 years on the job who told me &#8220;My godfather and all members of my Reading Club told me I have such a good taste &#8211; I should have been interior designer!&#8221; Every damn (and dumb) secretary feels fit to be a critic.</p>
<p>FYI: there is no nationally recognized licensing practice exist at the moment. We are encouraged, though, to participate in voluntary certification tests, 2 days in a row 4hrs each, that is provided by NCIDQ. And about time, I say. </p>
<p>In my own experience during the exam (I&#8217;m a Certified Commercial Designer, if that&#8217;s not clear yet), only the people who call themselves &#8220;decorators&#8221; or &#8220;feng shui&#8221; practitioners, or &#8220;design educators&#8221;, or &#8220;decorating consultants&#8221; were having difficulties with passing. And for some reason they tend to have 40 years experience, by the look of them.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot, Chaz. You reminded me why I sometimes hate the public I swore to serve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11255</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11255</guid>
		<description>&quot;What am I being charged with?&quot;

&quot;Practicing &lt;i&gt;feng shui&lt;/i&gt; without a license.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What am I being charged with?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Practicing <i>feng shui</i> without a license.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/5950/comment-page-1#comment-11253</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=5950#comment-11253</guid>
		<description>If it saves one child from having to live in a room whose accessories clash, &lt;i&gt;it is worth it&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it saves one child from having to live in a room whose accessories clash, <i>it is worth it</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

