Comments on: Strange search-engine queries (142) http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6226 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6226/comment-page-1#comment-11793 CGHill Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:24:01 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=6226#comment-11793 The better Google knows you, the more likely you are, they believe, to respond to one of their ubiquitous text ads. I save this stuff just because I can; I have most (though not all) of the Site Meter details for the last seven years. The better Google knows you, the more likely you are, they believe, to respond to one of their ubiquitous text ads.

I save this stuff just because I can; I have most (though not all) of the Site Meter details for the last seven years.

]]> By: Charles Pergiel http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6226/comment-page-1#comment-11790 Charles Pergiel Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:11:30 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=6226#comment-11790 I don't get it. Why would Google, or anyone else for that matter, want to keep search engine queries? I mean, other than to show that they could keep more crap than anyone else because they had BIGGER server farms with more and BIGGER disk drives. I think even the NSA would be hard pressed to come up with any kind of justification for saving that kind of garbage. On another note I am afraid of what Tam might do with the berkelium line. And hedgehogs. At Sonic. Burble snort. I don’t get it. Why would Google, or anyone else for that matter, want to keep search engine queries? I mean, other than to show that they could keep more crap than anyone else because they had BIGGER server farms with more and BIGGER disk drives. I think even the NSA would be hard pressed to come up with any kind of justification for saving that kind of garbage.

On another note I am afraid of what Tam might do with the berkelium line.

And hedgehogs. At Sonic. Burble snort.

]]>