I sometimes find these kind of tests hard. “Is sometimes lazy” - by whose definition? I berate myself for being “lazy” when I get less done than I want to get done, but by a perhaps-more-objective standard, I may not be “lazy.”
Took the test this morning (when I was still smarting about the paper rejection) and got 35, 35, 4, 57, and 84.
I took it now (after a morning of “not being lazy”) and got a 70, 79, 4, 69, and 76.
So only the low extraversion remains the same (And the neuroticism isn’t that much different either, I guess, but I argue that some of that is in the service of conscientiousness). Of course the fact that I feel less of a screw-up now affects how I evaluate my organization and “sloppiness.”
Kay Dennison said:
17 November 2008 @ 10:20 am
I took the test. I’m a sucker for them! LOL
Open to New Experiences — 95
Conscientious — 64
Extraverted — 89
Agreeable — 74
Neuroticism — 84
High-Strung
They came close but I think I’m more conscientious than they do and less agreeable than they do! Sigh
fillyjonk said:
17 November 2008 @ 2:13 pm
I sometimes find these kind of tests hard. “Is sometimes lazy” - by whose definition? I berate myself for being “lazy” when I get less done than I want to get done, but by a perhaps-more-objective standard, I may not be “lazy.”
Took the test this morning (when I was still smarting about the paper rejection) and got 35, 35, 4, 57, and 84.
I took it now (after a morning of “not being lazy”) and got a 70, 79, 4, 69, and 76.
So only the low extraversion remains the same (And the neuroticism isn’t that much different either, I guess, but I argue that some of that is in the service of conscientiousness). Of course the fact that I feel less of a screw-up now affects how I evaluate my organization and “sloppiness.”
Two-Headed Blog » The Big Five said:
18 November 2008 @ 9:25 am
[...] this over at Dustbury, and as I’m a total sucker for all things of a quiz or meme-type nature, I had to do [...]