<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Five and me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6667/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6667</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two-Headed Blog &#187; The Big Five</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6667/comment-page-1#comment-12558</link>
		<dc:creator>Two-Headed Blog &#187; The Big Five</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=6667#comment-12558</guid>
		<description>[...] this over at Dustbury, and as I’m a total sucker for all things of a quiz or meme-type nature, I had to do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this over at Dustbury, and as I’m a total sucker for all things of a quiz or meme-type nature, I had to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6667/comment-page-1#comment-12506</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=6667#comment-12506</guid>
		<description>I sometimes find these kind of tests hard. &quot;Is sometimes lazy&quot; - by whose definition? I berate myself for being &quot;lazy&quot; when I get less done than I want to get done, but by a perhaps-more-objective standard, I may not be &quot;lazy.&quot;

Took the test this morning (when I was still smarting about the paper rejection) and got 35, 35, 4, 57, and 84. 

I took it now (after a morning of &quot;not being lazy&quot;) and got a 70, 79, 4, 69, and 76. 

So only the low extraversion remains the same (And the neuroticism isn&#039;t that much different either, I guess, but I argue that some of that is in the service of conscientiousness). Of course the fact that I feel less of a screw-up now affects how I evaluate my organization and &quot;sloppiness.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes find these kind of tests hard. &#8220;Is sometimes lazy&#8221; &#8211; by whose definition? I berate myself for being &#8220;lazy&#8221; when I get less done than I want to get done, but by a perhaps-more-objective standard, I may not be &#8220;lazy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Took the test this morning (when I was still smarting about the paper rejection) and got 35, 35, 4, 57, and 84. </p>
<p>I took it now (after a morning of &#8220;not being lazy&#8221;) and got a 70, 79, 4, 69, and 76. </p>
<p>So only the low extraversion remains the same (And the neuroticism isn&#8217;t that much different either, I guess, but I argue that some of that is in the service of conscientiousness). Of course the fact that I feel less of a screw-up now affects how I evaluate my organization and &#8220;sloppiness.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Dennison</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/6667/comment-page-1#comment-12499</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Dennison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=6667#comment-12499</guid>
		<description>I took the test.  I&#039;m a sucker for them!  LOL

Open to New Experiences -- 95
Conscientious -- 64
Extraverted -- 89
Agreeable -- 74
Neuroticism -- 84
High-Strung 

They came close but I think I&#039;m more conscientious than they do and less agreeable than they do!  Sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the test.  I&#8217;m a sucker for them!  LOL</p>
<p>Open to New Experiences &#8212; 95<br />
Conscientious &#8212; 64<br />
Extraverted &#8212; 89<br />
Agreeable &#8212; 74<br />
Neuroticism &#8212; 84<br />
High-Strung </p>
<p>They came close but I think I&#8217;m more conscientious than they do and less agreeable than they do!  Sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

