<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A tradition upheld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15512</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15512</guid>
		<description>&quot;Behold, I am become (the Blue Screen of) Death, destroyer of good attitudes and productive days!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Behold, I am become (the Blue Screen of) Death, destroyer of good attitudes and productive days!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15510</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15510</guid>
		<description>Sort of It&#039;s Not Windows U, It&#039;s Windows ME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of It&#8217;s Not Windows U, It&#8217;s Windows ME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms7168</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15508</link>
		<dc:creator>ms7168</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15508</guid>
		<description>It appears as though Windows 7 is being designed as the next step after XP.  XP is actually Windows 5.1 and Windows 7 is going to be Windows 6.1.

It also appears that once it is released late this year Microsoft is hoping to relegate Vista to a bad dream!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears as though Windows 7 is being designed as the next step after XP.  XP is actually Windows 5.1 and Windows 7 is going to be Windows 6.1.</p>
<p>It also appears that once it is released late this year Microsoft is hoping to relegate Vista to a bad dream!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15502</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15502</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone with experience making indexes, I must point out that it should appear under both, with one being a &lt;i&gt;--See ...&lt;/i&gt; entry.  Actually, BSOD should be in the index, too.

Your index should include not only the most common way to which a concept is referred, but also to any variation with which a reader might think of it.

Indexing was like reverse SEO, sort of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone with experience making indexes, I must point out that it should appear under both, with one being a <i>&#8211;See &#8230;</i> entry.  Actually, BSOD should be in the index, too.</p>
<p>Your index should include not only the most common way to which a concept is referred, but also to any variation with which a reader might think of it.</p>
<p>Indexing was like reverse SEO, sort of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QA Hates You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Sticks With What Works</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15501</link>
		<dc:creator>QA Hates You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Sticks With What Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15501</guid>
		<description>[...] (Link seen on Dustbury.com.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Link seen on Dustbury.com.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis W. Porretto</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15498</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis W. Porretto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15498</guid>
		<description>But Charles, it&#039;s given rise to such wonderful haiku:

Windows NT crashed.
I am the Blue Screen of Death.
No one hears your screams.

Imagine how much poorer our culture would be without such!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Charles, it&#8217;s given rise to such wonderful haiku:</p>
<p>Windows NT crashed.<br />
I am the Blue Screen of Death.<br />
No one hears your screams.</p>
<p>Imagine how much poorer our culture would be without such!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Dennison</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15487</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Dennison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15487</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen it and survived it.  I am one of the unfortunate ones stuck with Vista.  I&#039;m currently exploring Linux.  Looks good so far. Easy to use.  No viruses.  Lots of support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen it and survived it.  I am one of the unfortunate ones stuck with Vista.  I&#8217;m currently exploring Linux.  Looks good so far. Easy to use.  No viruses.  Lots of support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15479</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15479</guid>
		<description>Today Trini and I got into a discussion of Windows books, and whether the pertinent entry for this phenomenon in such a book&#039;s index should be &quot;Blue Screen of Death&quot; or &quot;Death, Blue Screen of.&quot;  She argued that since BSOD is now pretty much the universal term, it&#039;s silly to list it anywhere in the D&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Trini and I got into a discussion of Windows books, and whether the pertinent entry for this phenomenon in such a book&#8217;s index should be &#8220;Blue Screen of Death&#8221; or &#8220;Death, Blue Screen of.&#8221;  She argued that since BSOD is now pretty much the universal term, it&#8217;s silly to list it anywhere in the D&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7539/comment-page-1#comment-15477</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7539#comment-15477</guid>
		<description>As big an &quot;improvement&quot; as Vista wasn&#039;t over XP, I believe that I&#039;ll pass on this one as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As big an &#8220;improvement&#8221; as Vista wasn&#8217;t over XP, I believe that I&#8217;ll pass on this one as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

