Comments on: Stimulus you can believe in

By: McGehee

McGehee — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:38:20 +0000

As Ron White put it, “You seen one woman naked, you wanna see ‘em all naked.”

By: CGHill

CGHill — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:40:44 +0000

“Less than photogenic” isn’t my idea of a disqualifier, since historically guys have wanted to see just about every conceivable female, um, stripped, with the possible exceptions of Aunt Tillie and the girl who works the late shift at the Taco Bell drive-thru, and both of them are at least negotiable.

Then again, I once got mooned by my ex.

By: Jeffro

Jeffro — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:41:05 +0000

It sounds good at first, but since the .gov is involved, we’d probably be waxing some less than photogenic women that none of us want to see, but will be forced to. I say this as a definitely less than photogenic male.

By: fillyjonk

fillyjonk — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:03:07 +0000

Well, OK. Half minus that between-two-and-ten-percent-depending-on-whose-statistics-you-believe.

By: Francis W. Porretto

Francis W. Porretto — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:18:38 +0000

Charles! What have you been drinking?

(Not quite half, Filly. At least, not if I can believe what I’ve heard from a few double-X types.)

By: fillyjonk

fillyjonk — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:01:52 +0000

Not sure what the equivalent would be for those of us who are distinctly UNstimulated by the thought of bikini-waxed females. (We do, after all, make up nearly half of the population…)

By: McGehee

McGehee — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:49:43 +0000

Definitely more bang for the buck.

Or something.