Comments on: Does this work? http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:22:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: JC http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779/comment-page-1#comment-16743 JC Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:47:50 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7779#comment-16743 No No

]]> By: Fetiche Nouvelle http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779/comment-page-1#comment-16711 Fetiche Nouvelle Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:58:23 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7779#comment-16711 You might be able to get away with that if you're 17, look 13, and are utterly adorable, but for anyone else...no. You might be able to get away with that if you’re 17, look 13, and are utterly adorable, but for anyone else…no.

]]> By: GradualDazzle http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779/comment-page-1#comment-16709 GradualDazzle Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:55:03 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7779#comment-16709 The socks don't really work for me, either, but the shoes are nifty. The socks don’t really work for me, either, but the shoes are nifty.

]]> By: fillyjonk http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779/comment-page-1#comment-16707 fillyjonk Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:37:11 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7779#comment-16707 High heels with socks is way too 1980s for me. (And at any rate: mannish socks plus feminine heels is too much of a semiotic mashup.) I tend to follow the rule of "If you're old enough to remember the trend when it was first popular, you should not be following it when it comes 'round again." Even trends that make sense, this one does not. I will admit that I wear socks with clogs and even Birkenstocks, but that is different. TOTALLY different. High heels with socks is way too 1980s for me. (And at any rate: mannish socks plus feminine heels is too much of a semiotic mashup.)

I tend to follow the rule of “If you’re old enough to remember the trend when it was first popular, you should not be following it when it comes ’round again.” Even trends that make sense, this one does not.

I will admit that I wear socks with clogs and even Birkenstocks, but that is different. TOTALLY different.

]]> By: Anne http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779/comment-page-1#comment-16696 Anne Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:52:13 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7779#comment-16696 While I'm not fond of the high-heels-with-socks look from a purely appearance point of view, I have to say that although pantyhose look terrific, years of dealing with pantyhose turn many women into socks fans. (This instant wysiwyg thing is very cool...) While I’m not fond of the high-heels-with-socks look from a purely appearance point of view, I have to say that although pantyhose look terrific, years of dealing with pantyhose turn many women into socks fans. (This instant wysiwyg thing is very cool…)

]]> By: Tatyana http://www.dustbury.com/archives/7779/comment-page-1#comment-16695 Tatyana Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:35:25 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=7779#comment-16695 not lace, more like an animal skin print. And the sox hsould be absolutely verbotten, the reason perfectly illustrated above not lace, more like an animal skin print.
And the sox hsould be absolutely verbotten, the reason perfectly illustrated above

]]>