Comments on: The line begins to blur http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8213 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:36:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8213/comment-page-1#comment-18702 CGHill Fri, 08 May 2009 15:54:13 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8213#comment-18702 Well, the App Store apparently is amenable to outside influences: <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/42361/98/" rel="nofollow">Apple has gone back and approved the NIN app.</a> Well, the App Store apparently is amenable to outside influences: Apple has gone back and approved the NIN app.

]]> By: Mister Snitch! http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8213/comment-page-1#comment-18580 Mister Snitch! Mon, 04 May 2009 16:52:14 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8213#comment-18580 "if I have to deal with a gatekeeper, I believe I have the right to be shown the key." But as a blog owner, you are a gatekeeper as well. The only difference is the App Store is a zillion times bigger. Really, aside from scale, it's the same deal. Take this comment, for example. It contains <a href="http://mistersnitch.blogspot.com/2009/05/emperors-new-clubs.html" rel="nofollow">a shameless link to a [possibly] funny post</a>. Should that be allowed, especially from someone who hasn't been around here in ages? Glad it's not MY call. “if I have to deal with a gatekeeper, I believe I have the right to be shown the key.”

But as a blog owner, you are a gatekeeper as well. The only difference is the App Store is a zillion times bigger. Really, aside from scale, it’s the same deal.

Take this comment, for example. It contains a shameless link to a [possibly] funny post. Should that be allowed, especially from someone who hasn’t been around here in ages? Glad it’s not MY call.

]]>