<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scoop 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8535/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8535</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Old Grouch</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8535/comment-page-1#comment-20283</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Grouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8535#comment-20283</guid>
		<description>They still have the old-media mindset that sees each story as a finished &quot;complete and correct&quot; project, not to be released unless and until it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; complete and correct.

What&#039;s wrong with sharing what you &lt;strong&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; know with readers/viewers?   (less gate-keeping and more transparency of process)  As:  &quot;We know (Or, &quot;The AP is reporting&quot; ) that Jackson was taken to the hospital.  There is one report - by the TMZ website - that he is dead, but so far there&#039;s been no confirmation from any other source.  ***DEVELOPING***&quot; 

It&#039;s a web page; you can always update it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They still have the old-media mindset that sees each story as a finished &#8220;complete and correct&#8221; project, not to be released unless and until it <em>is</em> complete and correct.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with sharing what you <strong>don&#8217;t</strong> know with readers/viewers?   (less gate-keeping and more transparency of process)  As:  &#8220;We know (Or, &#8220;The AP is reporting&#8221; ) that Jackson was taken to the hospital.  There is one report &#8211; by the TMZ website &#8211; that he is dead, but so far there&#8217;s been no confirmation from any other source.  ***DEVELOPING***&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a web page; you can always update it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GradualDazzle</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8535/comment-page-1#comment-20281</link>
		<dc:creator>GradualDazzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8535#comment-20281</guid>
		<description>I think that the era of &quot;reputable sources&quot; and &quot;disreputable sources&quot; is fast becoming past tense. At least, in the way we&#039;ve traditionally viewed them. I actually trust TMZ more than I trust the AP. Which is to say, I don&#039;t really trust any of them THAT much, but at least I know what TMZ&#039;s agenda is. The AP? I can venture a pretty good guess as to theirs, but they spend so much time pretending it doesn&#039;t exist, it makes me wonder how much news they actually also pretend doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the era of &#8220;reputable sources&#8221; and &#8220;disreputable sources&#8221; is fast becoming past tense. At least, in the way we&#8217;ve traditionally viewed them. I actually trust TMZ more than I trust the AP. Which is to say, I don&#8217;t really trust any of them THAT much, but at least I know what TMZ&#8217;s agenda is. The AP? I can venture a pretty good guess as to theirs, but they spend so much time pretending it doesn&#8217;t exist, it makes me wonder how much news they actually also pretend doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8535/comment-page-1#comment-20275</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8535#comment-20275</guid>
		<description>Just like the old fortune-teller: you remember the time she was right and forget the 2,873 times she was wrong.

I can assure you, had I access to presumably-difficult sources, which I don&#039;t, I wouldn&#039;t be giving everything away on a message board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like the old fortune-teller: you remember the time she was right and forget the 2,873 times she was wrong.</p>
<p>I can assure you, had I access to presumably-difficult sources, which I don&#8217;t, I wouldn&#8217;t be giving everything away on a message board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lackmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8535/comment-page-1#comment-20274</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lackmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8535#comment-20274</guid>
		<description>Great quote. I run into this situation a lot at www.okctalk.com. There&#039;s one person on the site who fancies himself as a new media journalist and is quick to post rumors, unsubstantiated developments, etc. When he gets it right, he&#039;s able to brag that his work proves he&#039;s on top of the news and the &quot;old media is not.&quot; There is no mention, of course, of the many items he posts that end up being wrong. At some point my profession needs to do a better job explaining this difference and why we still matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great quote. I run into this situation a lot at <a href="http://www.okctalk.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.okctalk.com</a>. There&#8217;s one person on the site who fancies himself as a new media journalist and is quick to post rumors, unsubstantiated developments, etc. When he gets it right, he&#8217;s able to brag that his work proves he&#8217;s on top of the news and the &#8220;old media is not.&#8221; There is no mention, of course, of the many items he posts that end up being wrong. At some point my profession needs to do a better job explaining this difference and why we still matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
