I’ll give it four Johns

This is the rating system at FilmChaw:

* * * * *  John Coltrane
  * * * *  John Lennon
    * * *  John Popper
      * *  John Mellencamp
        *  John Cougar Mellencamp
           John Tesh

Impressively exponential, if you ask me.

Share

 Tweet this

11 comments

  1. Jennifer »

    23 August 2009 · 6:04 pm

    I love it. Especially since Coletrane stands for excellence.

  2. Jennifer »

    23 August 2009 · 6:04 pm

    Coltrane, too.

  3. GradualDazzle »

    23 August 2009 · 6:05 pm

    I would actually put Tesh above Mellencamp, but other than that, it’s golden.

  4. Cary »

    23 August 2009 · 7:38 pm

    No John Gary?

  5. CGHill »

    23 August 2009 · 8:06 pm

    There’s a practical limit to how many Johns you can have.

  6. unimpressed »

    23 August 2009 · 9:48 pm

    Not even if you use half-sizes, as with shoes? :)

  7. Kirk »

    24 August 2009 · 9:08 am

    I wouldn’t put John Tesh above the john just off the hall, musically speaking.

  8. Dick Stanley »

    24 August 2009 · 11:37 am

    I dunno. Johns have been devalued now that they’re all low-flush.

  9. fillyjonk »

    24 August 2009 · 12:04 pm

    heh. I didn’t see at first that “Cougar” Mellencamp ranked below plain “Mellencamp.” That’s pretty awesome.

  10. CGHill »

    24 August 2009 · 12:09 pm

    Lots of subtleties for such a small list.

  11. fillyjonk »

    24 August 2009 · 12:34 pm

    Perhaps we should alert Edward Tufte, as this is a pretty efficient display of information…

RSS feed for comments on this post