I’ll give it four Johns
This is the rating system at FilmChaw:
* * * * * John Coltrane
* * * * John Lennon
* * * John Popper
* * John Mellencamp
* John Cougar Mellencamp
John Tesh
Impressively exponential, if you ask me.




Jennifer »
23 August 2009 · 6:04 pm
I love it. Especially since Coletrane stands for excellence.
Jennifer »
23 August 2009 · 6:04 pm
Coltrane, too.
GradualDazzle »
23 August 2009 · 6:05 pm
I would actually put Tesh above Mellencamp, but other than that, it’s golden.
Cary »
23 August 2009 · 7:38 pm
No John Gary?
CGHill »
23 August 2009 · 8:06 pm
There’s a practical limit to how many Johns you can have.
unimpressed »
23 August 2009 · 9:48 pm
Not even if you use half-sizes, as with shoes? :)
Kirk »
24 August 2009 · 9:08 am
I wouldn’t put John Tesh above the john just off the hall, musically speaking.
Dick Stanley »
24 August 2009 · 11:37 am
I dunno. Johns have been devalued now that they’re all low-flush.
fillyjonk »
24 August 2009 · 12:04 pm
heh. I didn’t see at first that “Cougar” Mellencamp ranked below plain “Mellencamp.” That’s pretty awesome.
CGHill »
24 August 2009 · 12:09 pm
Lots of subtleties for such a small list.
fillyjonk »
24 August 2009 · 12:34 pm
Perhaps we should alert Edward Tufte, as this is a pretty efficient display of information…