Comments on: A third less something http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8980 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: paulsmos http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8980/comment-page-1#comment-22711 paulsmos Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:42:13 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8980#comment-22711 -principles-ethics-results=progressive -principles-ethics-results=progressive

]]> By: McGehee http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8980/comment-page-1#comment-22706 McGehee Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:32:57 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8980#comment-22706 <blockquote><i>If you have none of these things, you may well have: Incumbent</i><b>-for-life.</b></blockquote>Fixed that for you.

If you have none of these things, you may well have: Incumbent-for-life.

Fixed that for you.

]]> By: Mark Alger http://www.dustbury.com/archives/8980/comment-page-1#comment-22705 Mark Alger Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:17:36 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=8980#comment-22705 All of which founders on the flawed premise that one wants results from government. M All of which founders on the flawed premise that one wants results from government.

M

]]>