<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wholly-original work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9019/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9019</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9019/comment-page-1#comment-22900</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9019#comment-22900</guid>
		<description>Oh. Dear. Lord.

This almost makes me wish students would just e-mail the fake &quot;corrupted&quot; files that another website offers. (How can they call it &quot;0 percent plagiarism&quot;? Isn&#039;t the fact that the student is submitting a paper they did not write changing that to at least 50% plagiarism? I mean, it&#039;s 0% when the paper is offered but 100% on the part of the student when they hand it in, claiming it&#039;s their own work, and the average of those two numbers is 50%, no?)

I admit to being a joyless harridan about this sort of thing but I had a student who REPEATED my class and who plagiarized again the second time he took it. The only thing he said to me after the second was, &quot;I didn&#039;t think you&#039;d check.&quot; Um, yeah. That might be part of why you&#039;re retaking the class?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. Dear. Lord.</p>
<p>This almost makes me wish students would just e-mail the fake &#8220;corrupted&#8221; files that another website offers. (How can they call it &#8220;0 percent plagiarism&#8221;? Isn&#8217;t the fact that the student is submitting a paper they did not write changing that to at least 50% plagiarism? I mean, it&#8217;s 0% when the paper is offered but 100% on the part of the student when they hand it in, claiming it&#8217;s their own work, and the average of those two numbers is 50%, no?)</p>
<p>I admit to being a joyless harridan about this sort of thing but I had a student who REPEATED my class and who plagiarized again the second time he took it. The only thing he said to me after the second was, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t think you&#8217;d check.&#8221; Um, yeah. That might be part of why you&#8217;re retaking the class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9019/comment-page-1#comment-22891</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9019#comment-22891</guid>
		<description>I once submitted a paper on leadership that was nothing but a short story (written by me of course). Got a good grade too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once submitted a paper on leadership that was nothing but a short story (written by me of course). Got a good grade too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

