http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9020 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:58:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9020/comment-page-1#comment-23011 Hurry, get those lawsuits filed before reform Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:44:47 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9020#comment-23011 [...] have been here before, notes Dustbury [...] [...] have been here before, notes Dustbury [...]

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9020/comment-page-1#comment-22913 CGHill Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:12:27 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9020#comment-22913 It's a specialized sort of civil case, one in which no contractual law is involved. If Lumpy's Garage fails to fix your Dodge as promised, that's not a tort; if Lumpy backs over your foot to get the car out of the shop, that's a tort. (Extremely oversimplified, yes.) It’s a specialized sort of civil case, one in which no contractual law is involved. If Lumpy’s Garage fails to fix your Dodge as promised, that’s not a tort; if Lumpy backs over your foot to get the car out of the shop, that’s a tort. (Extremely oversimplified, yes.)

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9020/comment-page-1#comment-22908 Charles Pergiel Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:25:40 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9020#comment-22908 Okay, now I'm confused. I know there is criminal law, and I know about civil law, but what the heck is a tort case if it isn't a civil case? Okay, now I’m confused. I know there is criminal law, and I know about civil law, but what the heck is a tort case if it isn’t a civil case?

]]>