Comments on: The parties: over http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:27:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: CGHill http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177/comment-page-1#comment-23608 CGHill Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:40:13 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9177#comment-23608 Bill Whittle's been on the blogroll here for several years. Bill Whittle’s been on the blogroll here for several years.

]]> By: paulsmos http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177/comment-page-1#comment-23607 paulsmos Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:57:31 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9177#comment-23607 try this on ...it's called "TRIBES"..http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/ try this on …it’s called
“TRIBES”..http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/

]]> By: Sheri http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177/comment-page-1#comment-23600 Sheri Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:32:40 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9177#comment-23600 I, too, have no fondness for the whole "bipartisan let's work together and all get along and move forward for the country blah blah blah" bullcrap meme. The differences are important and to be emphasized, not diluted and given up. Just my opinion, dullard that I am. I spend too much time reading the Founders and steeped in 1700s AmHist, that's my problem. I, too, have no fondness for the whole “bipartisan let’s work together and all get along and move forward for the country blah blah blah” bullcrap meme. The differences are important and to be emphasized, not diluted and given up. Just my opinion, dullard that I am. I spend too much time reading the Founders and steeped in 1700s AmHist, that’s my problem.

]]> By: Jeff Brokaw http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177/comment-page-1#comment-23599 Jeff Brokaw Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:38:04 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9177#comment-23599 Full agreement here. As I commented at Tony Woodlief's today, the real divide isn't between Ds and Rs, it's between government and we the people. Both Ds and Rs routinely make back-room deals to enrich and empower themselves at our expense. Full agreement here. As I commented at Tony Woodlief’s today, the real divide isn’t between Ds and Rs, it’s between government and we the people. Both Ds and Rs routinely make back-room deals to enrich and empower themselves at our expense.

]]> By: McGehee http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177/comment-page-1#comment-23598 McGehee Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:09:48 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9177#comment-23598 <blockquote><i>bending Republicans to my will</i></blockquote> If "my" were interpreted to mean "possessed by a Democrat," the above is pretty much what "bipartisanship" means among the Beltway elite -- including Beltway Republicans, unfortunately.

bending Republicans to my will

If “my” were interpreted to mean “possessed by a Democrat,” the above is pretty much what “bipartisanship” means among the Beltway elite — including Beltway Republicans, unfortunately.

]]> By: dawn summers http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9177/comment-page-1#comment-23597 dawn summers Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:50:12 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9177#comment-23597 I'm with you and (gulp) the Cheneys. I HATE bipartisanship, unless we really mean bending Republicans to my will...then maybe, but I'd still rather have then cry uncle and just admit defeat. I’m with you and (gulp) the Cheneys. I HATE bipartisanship, unless we really mean bending Republicans to my will…then maybe, but I’d still rather have then cry uncle and just admit defeat.

]]>