http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9305 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9305/comment-page-1#comment-24709 McGehee Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:25:09 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9305#comment-24709 Maybe they need to put their bots in charge of finding the most up-to-date satellite imagery. Maybe they need to put their bots in charge of finding the most up-to-date satellite imagery.

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9305/comment-page-1#comment-24625 CGHill Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:55:01 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9305#comment-24625 Which is odd, given the fact that I'm already getting Googlers looking for "Acura logo inverted" (<a href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9310" rel="nofollow"><em>q.v.</em></a>). Which is odd, given the fact that I’m already getting Googlers looking for “Acura logo inverted” (q.v.).

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9305/comment-page-1#comment-24620 McGehee Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:35:34 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9305#comment-24620 Google Maps doesn't seem to be very systematic about keeping its imagery updated. Its aerial shots of Coweta County show a place that might support 75,000 people -- we've been over 100,000 for quite a while now. Google Maps doesn’t seem to be very systematic about keeping its imagery updated. Its aerial shots of Coweta County show a place that might support 75,000 people — we’ve been over 100,000 for quite a while now.

]]>