<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kilimanjaro!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nation of Cowards &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hello Babezilla + Weekend Linkfest!</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25517</link>
		<dc:creator>Nation of Cowards &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hello Babezilla + Weekend Linkfest!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25517</guid>
		<description>[...] He was also first to grace the Reader with Eve, whose high heels seem a tad bit&#8230;redundant. * Dustbury also mentioned Eve, with some interesting statistical analysis. * The Pegu blog has a clip that of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He was also first to grace the Reader with Eve, whose high heels seem a tad bit&#8230;redundant. * Dustbury also mentioned Eve, with some interesting statistical analysis. * The Pegu blog has a clip that of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War on the Poor with Kate Beckinsale</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25513</link>
		<dc:creator>War on the Poor with Kate Beckinsale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25513</guid>
		<description>[...] Scarlett Johansson&#160;&#160;&#160;Twilight’s Ashley Greene’s Maxim Spread&#160;&#160;&#160;Kilimanjaro! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scarlett Johansson&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Twilight’s Ashley Greene’s Maxim Spread&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Kilimanjaro! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25486</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25486</guid>
		<description>Then again, &lt;a href=&quot;http://thechive.com/2009/11/new-photos-of-the-worlds-tallest-model-arrive-10-photos-1-video/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one extant video looks far too cheap to have been seriously tweaked&lt;/a&gt;.  Weirdly, the site claims she&#039;s exactly 205 cm but &quot;nearly 7&#039; tall,&quot; which works only if &quot;nearly&quot; encompasses a three-inch fudge factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, <a href="http://thechive.com/2009/11/new-photos-of-the-worlds-tallest-model-arrive-10-photos-1-video/" rel="nofollow">one extant video looks far too cheap to have been seriously tweaked</a>.  Weirdly, the site claims she&#8217;s exactly 205 cm but &#8220;nearly 7&#8242; tall,&#8221; which works only if &#8220;nearly&#8221; encompasses a three-inch fudge factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25428</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25428</guid>
		<description>Something seems wrong with that particular shot &#151; Eve looks a lot more than 26 percent taller than her friend there &#151; but I&#039;m not quite sure what.

It is probably prudent, though, to assume that all photos are &#039;shopped until proven otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something seems wrong with that particular shot &#8212; Eve looks a lot more than 26 percent taller than her friend there &#8212; but I&#8217;m not quite sure what.</p>
<p>It is probably prudent, though, to assume that all photos are &#8217;shopped until proven otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25426</guid>
		<description>Duh, my conversion into inches was off. That&#039;ll teach me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, my conversion into inches was off. That&#8217;ll teach me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hertzlinger</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25421</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hertzlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25421</guid>
		<description>Photoshop? Those legs don&#039;t look real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshop? Those legs don&#8217;t look real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25368</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25368</guid>
		<description>A shade under six foot nine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shade under six foot nine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian J.</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25366</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25366</guid>
		<description>How tall is that in American?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How tall is that in American?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25348</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll bet &quot;Eve&#039;s&quot; inseam is more than 34&quot; - my only experience with a tall woman was in college - 6&#039; even and 38&quot; - and she was hawt in a bikini, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet &#8220;Eve&#8217;s&#8221; inseam is more than 34&#8243; &#8211; my only experience with a tall woman was in college &#8211; 6&#8242; even and 38&#8243; &#8211; and she was hawt in a bikini, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9408/comment-page-1#comment-25325</link>
		<dc:creator>unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9408#comment-25325</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the quintessential &quot;long and short&quot; of Intimidation, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the quintessential &#8220;long and short&#8221; of Intimidation, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
