<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time slices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9436/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9436</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9436/comment-page-1#comment-25540</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9436#comment-25540</guid>
		<description>...especially since it also implies its inverse, immunity to despair-mongering.

Of course, to good old homemade despair maybe not so much with the immunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;especially since it also implies its inverse, immunity to despair-mongering.</p>
<p>Of course, to good old homemade despair maybe not so much with the immunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9436/comment-page-1#comment-25539</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9436#comment-25539</guid>
		<description>To me &quot;immunity to reassurance&quot; implies an awareness that the reassurer doesn&#039;t know any better than I do what&#039;s going to happen.

Perfectly healthy thing, I&#039;d say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me &#8220;immunity to reassurance&#8221; implies an awareness that the reassurer doesn&#8217;t know any better than I do what&#8217;s going to happen.</p>
<p>Perfectly healthy thing, I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffro</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9436/comment-page-1#comment-25518</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9436#comment-25518</guid>
		<description>Most of your introspectives really resonate with me - &quot;immunity to reassurance.&quot; Experience? Pessimism? Realism? All of the above? Does it matter? The results are the same - I don&#039;t trust unbridled optimism either.

Have we put our lives on time delay in order to pass judgment on a situation more accurately? To see how it starts to unfold  - and at least sense a familiar pattern? Fascinating, to steal a quote. Does that make me a part-person? That apparently requires a major commitment to obsessiveness and fanaticism - something that requires more effort than I&#039;m willing to give.

Good brain food for a Sunday afternoon, Chaz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of your introspectives really resonate with me &#8211; &#8220;immunity to reassurance.&#8221; Experience? Pessimism? Realism? All of the above? Does it matter? The results are the same &#8211; I don&#8217;t trust unbridled optimism either.</p>
<p>Have we put our lives on time delay in order to pass judgment on a situation more accurately? To see how it starts to unfold  &#8211; and at least sense a familiar pattern? Fascinating, to steal a quote. Does that make me a part-person? That apparently requires a major commitment to obsessiveness and fanaticism &#8211; something that requires more effort than I&#8217;m willing to give.</p>
<p>Good brain food for a Sunday afternoon, Chaz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

