<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weird political science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9447/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9447</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9447/comment-page-1#comment-25614</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9447#comment-25614</guid>
		<description>&quot;And a better one than Michael Moore, at that.&quot;

Low indeed your bar is set...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And a better one than Michael Moore, at that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Low indeed your bar is set&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9447/comment-page-1#comment-25606</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9447#comment-25606</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never gotten the thing about John Hughes. His movies were as full of pretty lies any other Hollywood product --even more so, with their 80s faux &quot;alternative&quot; sheen. But &lt;i&gt;Pretty In Pink&lt;/i&gt; tried to make us think that 1) a gawky redhead could be transformed into a beauty queen by the donning of a hideous pink dress, and 2) that a weird girl from the uncool neighborhood could capture the high school preppie god&#039;s heart. And &lt;i&gt;Ferris Bueller&#039;s Day Off&lt;/i&gt; tried to pass off yet another cool jerk as a hero, even though he probably ruined his best friend&#039;s life (by getting his friend&#039;s dad&#039;s car smashed to pieces). I was on Ben Stein&#039;s side.

What other John Hughes movies have I seen... I didn&#039;t realize &lt;i&gt;Planes, Trains, and Automobiles&lt;/i&gt; was his. That was funny, though it had nothing to do with high school kids so maybe that was why. &lt;i&gt;She&#039;s Having A Baby&lt;/i&gt; was annoying -- I can&#039;t really identify with anyone who falls in love to a Boston song. &lt;i&gt;Weird Science&lt;/i&gt; was funny, despite having high school kids as characters. I guess I like his broad farces the best, but I wouldn&#039;t say there&#039;s any political satire to be found in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never gotten the thing about John Hughes. His movies were as full of pretty lies any other Hollywood product &#8211;even more so, with their 80s faux &#8220;alternative&#8221; sheen. But <i>Pretty In Pink</i> tried to make us think that 1) a gawky redhead could be transformed into a beauty queen by the donning of a hideous pink dress, and 2) that a weird girl from the uncool neighborhood could capture the high school preppie god&#8217;s heart. And <i>Ferris Bueller&#8217;s Day Off</i> tried to pass off yet another cool jerk as a hero, even though he probably ruined his best friend&#8217;s life (by getting his friend&#8217;s dad&#8217;s car smashed to pieces). I was on Ben Stein&#8217;s side.</p>
<p>What other John Hughes movies have I seen&#8230; I didn&#8217;t realize <i>Planes, Trains, and Automobiles</i> was his. That was funny, though it had nothing to do with high school kids so maybe that was why. <i>She&#8217;s Having A Baby</i> was annoying &#8212; I can&#8217;t really identify with anyone who falls in love to a Boston song. <i>Weird Science</i> was funny, despite having high school kids as characters. I guess I like his broad farces the best, but I wouldn&#8217;t say there&#8217;s any political satire to be found in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9447/comment-page-1#comment-25605</link>
		<dc:creator>fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9447#comment-25605</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d not bet against the statement that someone, somewhere, has done a Master&#039;s Thesis examining the sociopolitical ramifications of Hughes movies. 

And it does make me somewhat sad that it seems that high school (or worse, from my perspective, JUNIOR high school) continues to be played out in adulthood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d not bet against the statement that someone, somewhere, has done a Master&#8217;s Thesis examining the sociopolitical ramifications of Hughes movies. </p>
<p>And it does make me somewhat sad that it seems that high school (or worse, from my perspective, JUNIOR high school) continues to be played out in adulthood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

