http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9454 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9454/comment-page-1#comment-25631 Lisa Paul Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:34:24 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9454#comment-25631 Okay, I'm a fool. The alleged painter was Walter Keane. Okay, I’m a fool. The alleged painter was Walter Keane.

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9454/comment-page-1#comment-25630 Lisa Paul Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:31:40 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9454#comment-25630 So I'm completely confused. I thought Bob Keane was that guy who painted all the kids with big eyes. Or claimed he painted them until a sensational trial in San Francisco proved that his wife actually painted them. (She was suing for copyright. The judge ordered the both of them to paint a big eyed kid in front of him. She did. He said he had a shoulder injury and couldn't.) So I’m completely confused. I thought Bob Keane was that guy who painted all the kids with big eyes. Or claimed he painted them until a sensational trial in San Francisco proved that his wife actually painted them. (She was suing for copyright. The judge ordered the both of them to paint a big eyed kid in front of him. She did. He said he had a shoulder injury and couldn’t.)

]]>