Share

 Tweet this

3 comments

1. McGehee »

   9 December 2009 · 3:13 pm

   Oddly enough, “-611″ is also Obama’s approval index this week.

2. Cary »

   9 December 2009 · 3:39 pm

   I hope that’s not according to Judy Johnson.

   I think her numbers might be a little skewed.

3. hatless in hattiesburg »

   9 December 2009 · 10:55 pm

   now THAT’s a hockeystick graph! algore has nothing on those guys…

RSS feed for comments on this post

• (The Web Site Formerly Known As Chez Chaz)
  
  The Charles G. Hill Web Pages, HTML/PHP Bad Example and Bandwidth Wastage Station
  Dustbury, Oklahoma, USA
  
  America's fourth-best blogger, since 1996
  
  "I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less."
  
  
• 



• 
  dustbury.com     web                
  
  
  
  

• It is written

  • "If you don't throw it, they can't hit it." — Lefty Gomez




• Current archives

  Select month February 2012  (66) January 2012  (163) December 2011  (166) November 2011  (159) October 2011  (163) September 2011  (158) August 2011  (164) July 2011  (169) June 2011  (156) May 2011  (177) April 2011  (165) March 2011  (173) February 2011  (154) January 2011  (174) December 2010  (170) November 2010  (173) October 2010  (169) September 2010  (160) August 2010  (168) July 2010  (183) June 2010  (168) May 2010  (172) April 2010  (174) March 2010  (172) February 2010  (163) January 2010  (183) December 2009  (193) November 2009  (174) October 2009  (190) September 2009  (165) August 2009  (175) July 2009  (179) June 2009  (176) May 2009  (178) April 2009  (185) March 2009  (186) February 2009  (162) January 2009  (190) December 2008  (198) November 2008  (187) October 2008  (200) September 2008  (182) August 2008  (162) July 2008  (173) June 2008  (152) May 2008  (168) April 2008  (159) March 2008  (162) February 2008  (154) January 2008  (166) December 2007  (176) November 2007  (169) October 2007  (165) September 2007  (163) August 2007  (177) July 2007  (152) June 2007  (165) May 2007  (169) April 2007  (169) March 2007  (183) February 2007  (159) January 2007  (174) December 2006  (191) November 2006  (181) October 2006  (185) September 2006  (150)




• Prior archives

  • 6/00 through 8/06




• Categories

  Select category Almost Yogurt  (930) Base Paths  (43) Begging Bowl  (137) Birthday Suitable  (190) Blogorrhea  (760) Bogus History  (81) Bushel of Currency  (62) City Scene  (495) Common Cents  (346) Dream Academy  (16) Driver’s Seat  (1020) Dyssynergy  (824) Ease and Disease  (129) Entirely Too Cool  (535) Family Joules  (181) Fileophile  (117) General Disinterest  (303) Immaterial Witness  (115) It Could Be Verse  (7) Life and/or Death  (89) Listing to One Side  (71) Livre du Visage  (41) Net Proceeds  (672) Next Generation  (41) Outgoing Mail  (24) Overmodulation  (111) PEBKAC  (539) Political Science Fiction  (773) QOTW  (295) Rag Trade  (497) Reviewing Stand  (30) Rule 5  (249) Sarahndipity  (56) Say What?  (402) Scams and Spams  (153) Screaming Memes  (63) Soonerland  (495) Stemware  (278) Surlywood  (168) Table for One  (396) TANSTAAFL  (27) The Way We Were  (130) Tongue and Groove  (494) Tweetwaffle  (89) Ventually  (165) Warn Mode Due  (20) Wastes of Oxygen  (208) We So Excited  (45) Weather or Not  (117) Word Up  (84) World Tour ’07  (34) World Tour ’08  (23) Worth a Fork  (280) You Asked For It  (285) Your 15 Minutes Are Up  (45)




• Meta

  • Log in
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • WordPress
  • PhoenixBlue
  • Backup blog




• Et cetera

• Correspondence:
  chaz at dustbury dot com
  
• I'm a Modified Food Starch in the TTLB Ecosystem
• 
• Version 15.24
• 367 feed subscribers

• 

• 

• 

And finally

• "I haven't the faintest notion as to what Dustbury is; and even less notion as to what functional purpose Dustbury serves. The words 'Dustbury' and 'psychopathia' seem invariably conjoined."
•     — F. Gwynplaine MacIntyre (1948-2010)

•