http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9504 I couldn't possibly fail to disagree with you less. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:36:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9504/comment-page-1#comment-25876 CGHill Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:57:36 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9504#comment-25876 The warning sign is pretty well established by now; anyone who claims to be surprised simply hasn't been paying attention. The warning sign is pretty well established by now; anyone who claims to be surprised simply hasn’t been paying attention.

]]> http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9504/comment-page-1#comment-25875 McGehee Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:52:41 +0000 http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9504#comment-25875 And those who've seen ordinary people <i>sans couture</i> (or whatever the correct French would be) probably don't mind that such designations will involve the posting of warning signs. And those who’ve seen ordinary people sans couture (or whatever the correct French would be) probably don’t mind that such designations will involve the posting of warning signs.

]]>