<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Always Golightly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637</link>
	<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly fail to disagree with you less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rule 5 Sunday : The Other McCain</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26481</link>
		<dc:creator>Rule 5 Sunday : The Other McCain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26481</guid>
		<description>[...] Dustbury goes for some Audrey Hepburn. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dustbury goes for some Audrey Hepburn. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26429</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26429</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t help but pass this along.  &lt;em&gt;Progressive Boink&lt;/em&gt; has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://progressiveboink.com/archive/100greatestcharacters/40-1.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;highly-subjective list of the 100 greatest characters of film&lt;/a&gt;, and Holly Golightly comes in 14th.

Right above, um, Biggus Dickus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but pass this along.  <em>Progressive Boink</em> has a <a href="http://progressiveboink.com/archive/100greatestcharacters/40-1.htm" rel="nofollow">highly-subjective list of the 100 greatest characters of film</a>, and Holly Golightly comes in 14th.</p>
<p>Right above, um, Biggus Dickus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gold, Guns, and Amber Heard</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26427</link>
		<dc:creator>Gold, Guns, and Amber Heard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26427</guid>
		<description>[...] Audrey Hepburn&#160;&#160;&#160;Happy New Year!&#160;&#160;&#160;The Swinging Barmaids [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Audrey Hepburn&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Happy New Year!&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The Swinging Barmaids [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26339</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26339</guid>
		<description>The existence of an icon presumes timelessness, or at least duration comfortably in excess of Flavor of the Month.

And I think part of it, in Hepburn&#039;s case, is accessibility: &lt;em&gt;she&lt;/em&gt; wasn&#039;t accessible, particularly, but the look, and the attitudes which came to be associated with it, were and are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The existence of an icon presumes timelessness, or at least duration comfortably in excess of Flavor of the Month.</p>
<p>And I think part of it, in Hepburn&#8217;s case, is accessibility: <em>she</em> wasn&#8217;t accessible, particularly, but the look, and the attitudes which came to be associated with it, were and are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26338</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26338</guid>
		<description>No dispute on Hepburn&#039;s timeless qualities. I&#039;m just wondering (and maybe this didn&#039;t come across in my post) how that translates into countless &quot;girl crushes&quot; from such a cross-section of women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No dispute on Hepburn&#8217;s timeless qualities. I&#8217;m just wondering (and maybe this didn&#8217;t come across in my post) how that translates into countless &#8220;girl crushes&#8221; from such a cross-section of women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulsmos</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26324</link>
		<dc:creator>paulsmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26324</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I have always maintained that she was the most beautiful woman I&#039;d ever seen. &quot;The Nun&#039;s Story&quot; really set the hook in to me....maybe it was because I was in parochial school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I have always maintained that she was the most beautiful woman I&#8217;d ever seen. &#8220;The Nun&#8217;s Story&#8221; really set the hook in to me&#8230;.maybe it was because I was in parochial school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGHill</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26323</link>
		<dc:creator>CGHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26323</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine the LBD ever going away.  Fortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine the LBD ever going away.  Fortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Dennison</title>
		<link>http://www.dustbury.com/archives/9637/comment-page-1#comment-26322</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Dennison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dustbury.com/?p=9637#comment-26322</guid>
		<description>No one.  Audrey Hepburn had style and class in an era when those qualities were admired.  There&#039;s is no one like her.  I really respected her when she gave up Hollywood to marry the man she loved and raise her children in privacy.  And her work with the U.N. for children in her later years was wonderful, too.  

And yeah, I still prefer a &#039;little black dress&#039; when I have to dress up -- they are timeless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one.  Audrey Hepburn had style and class in an era when those qualities were admired.  There&#8217;s is no one like her.  I really respected her when she gave up Hollywood to marry the man she loved and raise her children in privacy.  And her work with the U.N. for children in her later years was wonderful, too.  </p>
<p>And yeah, I still prefer a &#8216;little black dress&#8217; when I have to dress up &#8212; they are timeless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

